找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Equity in the Civil Law Tradition; Renato Beneduzi Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 傷害
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:46:11 | 只看該作者
Arbeit, Exklusion und Ungerechtigkeition equity a single definition which could be regarded as universally valid throughout the whole history of Roman law. Nevertheless, some general patterns do emerge from this multitude of sources of which we can try to make some sense.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:08:06 | 只看該作者
?Wir sind hier keine Phantasiefirma“hroughout the whole empire was definitely not a reality at the time of the Diocletian-Constantinian monarchy, and even less so when king Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustus, the last emperor in the West, in 476 AD.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:10:17 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:36:55 | 只看該作者
Equity in Greece,rete object of cognition (.) never came into existence. The very notion of . (in the sense of .) was strange to the Greek mind and Athenians were actually very suspicious about the dangers to democracy and justice that the existence of a class of citizens versed in the law would pose to the city.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:18:38 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:34:04 | 只看該作者
Equity in the Middle Ages,hroughout the whole empire was definitely not a reality at the time of the Diocletian-Constantinian monarchy, and even less so when king Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustus, the last emperor in the West, in 476 AD.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:42:06 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:17:21 | 只看該作者
Book 2021anonists (chapter 4). Subsequently, the author analyses how the notion of equity was dealtwith in the Modern Era by legal humanists, Protestant and Catholic theologians, scholars of the usus modernus pandectarum and of Roman-Dutch law, and then by legal rationalism and the philosophers of the Enligh
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:36:39 | 只看該作者
with in the Modern Era by legal humanists, Protestant and Catholic theologians, scholars of the usus modernus pandectarum and of Roman-Dutch law, and then by legal rationalism and the philosophers of the Enligh978-3-030-78069-2978-3-030-78067-8
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:23:55 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-22 07:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
黔南| 四子王旗| 太保市| 凯里市| 嘉荫县| 张掖市| 新乐市| 双柏县| 佳木斯市| 道孚县| 巍山| 东丰县| 义乌市| 抚顺县| 霍林郭勒市| 静安区| 大洼县| 邢台县| 农安县| 徐闻县| 托克逊县| 万年县| 大田县| 来安县| 七台河市| 疏附县| 郁南县| 双鸭山市| 永寿县| 兴义市| 秭归县| 阿拉善盟| 泸定县| 屯留县| 正宁县| 东方市| 中宁县| 南岸区| 华池县| 外汇| 彭州市|