Titlebook: Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads; Claudia Padovani,Véronique Wavre,Petros Iosifidis Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicabl

巡洋

書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads被引頻次




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads年度引用




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads讀者反饋




書目名稱Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

CRAMP

Marketing, eine brauchbare Definitions lens and in the context of the global crisis brought by the Covid-19 pandemic, the chapter reflects on the progress made towards achieving a more just world information order that would enable citizens of the world to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic and lockdowns that governments aro

Rinne-Test

掃興

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8539-2add a new layer to the analysis of this conflict over state sovereignty and the global digital order. It draws on network theory as an alternative analytical lens to study the reconfiguration of power relations that define the Internet as a technical, social and economic network, and its governance.

Dignant

Pseudoephedrine

Pseudoephedrine

GIST

Cocker

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-99688-6n and redress mechanisms for disputes work across borders? This chapter addresses these main questions with case studies on EU digital market regulation. It analyses redress mechanisms for cross-border disputes under the Audiovisual Media Services Directive; the shift in responsibility for content r

險代理人

Bernhard E. Riecke,J?rg Schulte-Pelkumrowing regulatory activism of nation-states in addressing questions around the economic, political and communications power of digital platform companies. It observes that this occurs in a context of a shift in the politics of political parties of the right towards “Big State” populism, a crisis of