找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemology versus Ontology; Essays on the Philos P. Dybjer,Sten Lindstr?m,G. Sundholm Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 26172|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:07:15 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology
副標(biāo)題Essays on the Philos
編輯P. Dybjer,Sten Lindstr?m,G. Sundholm
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313350/313350.mp4
概述Comprehensive overview of the philosophical problems of the foundational framework in current mathematics.Demonstrates the impact of the work of the eminent academic: Per Martin-L?f.Contains contribut
叢書名稱Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Epistemology versus Ontology; Essays on the Philos P. Dybjer,Sten Lindstr?m,G. Sundholm Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
描述This book brings together philosophers, mathematicians and logicians to penetrate important problems in the philosophy and foundations of mathematics. In philosophy, one has been concerned with the opposition between constructivism and classical mathematics and the different ontological and epistemological views that are reflected in this opposition. The dominant foundational framework for current mathematics is classical logic and set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC). This framework is, however, laden with philosophical difficulties. One important alternative foundational programme that is actively pursued today is predicativistic constructivism based on Martin-L?f type theory. Associated philosophical foundations are meaning theories in the tradition of Wittgenstein, Dummett, Prawitz and Martin-L?f. What is the relation between proof-theoretical semantics in the tradition of Gentzen, Prawitz, and Martin-L?f and Wittgensteinian or other accounts of meaning-as-use? What can proof-theoretical analyses tell us about the scope and limits of constructive and predicative mathematics?
出版日期Book 2012
關(guān)鍵詞Constructive Type Theory; Dummett; Gentzen; Intuitionism; Martin-L?f; Martin-L?f‘s type theory; Mathematic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4435-6
isbn_softcover978-94-017-8238-8
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4435-6Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2012
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemology versus Ontology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:02:09 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:56:15 | 只看該作者
,Diphtherie, lobul?re Pneumonie, Scharlach,geometry and, in general, Hilbert’s axiomatic method, but also relativity theory and the so-called method of ideal elements. By drawing upon certain analogies rather than theory-constructions, these ideas affected not only his thinking about mathematics, but also his thinking about language and the nature of philosophy in general.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:34:19 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:16:58 | 只看該作者
Wittgenstein’s Diagonal Argument: A Variation on Cantor and Turingr immediately after mentioning Turing, Wittgenstein frames what he calls a “variant” of Cantor’s diagonal proof. We present and assess Wittgenstein’s variant, contending that it forms a distinctive form of proof, and an elaboration rather than a rejection of Turing or Cantor.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:58:28 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:14:35 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:15:06 | 只看該作者
Ahmed Ghazi,R. Devotini,Domenico Venezianoer logic has categorical characterizations of relevant mathematical structures, while set theory has non-standard models, amounts to no difference at all. Second order logic and set theory permit quite similar categoricity results on one hand, and similar non-standard models on the other hand.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:28:23 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:58:24 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 03:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁德市| 纳雍县| 竹山县| 江安县| 繁峙县| 红桥区| 崇左市| 达尔| 民和| 肥东县| 合山市| 开平市| 疏附县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 黑龙江省| 长泰县| 泗洪县| 栾川县| 柳河县| 温泉县| 郑州市| 高安市| 平陆县| 灵宝市| 历史| 普兰县| 黑水县| 淅川县| 基隆市| 宣城市| 布拖县| 保定市| 上林县| 额敏县| 香港| 九龙县| 凌云县| 西宁市| 武山县| 乌鲁木齐市| 孟村|