Titlebook: Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities; Jeroen van Dongen,Herman Paul Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Ep

hierarchy

書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities讀者反饋學科排名

Introduction

blackout

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48893-6Epistemic Virtues; Sciences and Humanities; Scholarly Personae; History of the Humanities; History of Sc

相容

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22167-6humanities.” Given that virtues like objectivity, honesty, and accuracy are not confined to specific disciplines, they allow for comparative historical research between scientific fields as well as for histories of transfer, borrowing, and adaptation between disciplines. Such research, however, requ

outset

Estimation of rate coefficients,proaches, valuable as they are, neglect the fact that certain changes also reflect changes in metaphysical sensibilities. Certain epistemic virtues and vices are defined relative to an estimate of our epistemic situation that is, in turn, defined by a broader vision or picture of the nature of reali

cloture

cloture

M. Braza,H. Ha Minh,J. B. Cazalbou needs to have some reassurance that further investigation will be fruitful despite setbacks, uncertainty, or confusing results. Two important physical scientists, James C. Maxwell and Arthur S. Eddington, drew on their religious beliefs and practices to help resolve this issue. They had very differ

CHOKE

Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documentsnts. This change accompanied his turn towards unified field theory and different presentations of himself, eventually leading to his highly programmatic . in 1949. Einstein enlisted his own history and professional stature to mold an ideal of a theoretical physicist who represented particular episte

糾纏,纏繞

Process Measurement and Redesign,gues that dispositions perceived as detrimental to scholarly work were often difficult to distinguish from social or religious vices. Indeed, when Heinrich Ewald (1803–1875) and Reinhart Dozy (1820–1883) were blamed for “dogmatism” and “rashness,” these were epistemic as much as social and religious

Malaise

Malathi Srinivasan,Ram Rajasekharanecial focus on obituaries written for the G?ttingen professors Wilhelm Weber, Friedrich W?hler, and Georg Waitz. Although virtue language was far more prevalent in Waitz’s necrologies than in those commemorating W?hler and Weber, historians, chemists, and physicists resembled each other in that they