找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs; Deborah K. Heikes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 14458|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:23:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs
編輯Deborah K. Heikes
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313317/313317.mp4
概述Considers how racist and sexist beliefs can be held to be genuinely undesirable in a world of post-truth and alt-facts.Addresses epistemic involuntarism and whether individuals are responsible for the
圖書封面Titlebook: Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs;  Deborah K. Heikes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu
描述This book considers whether we can be epistemically responsible for undesirable beliefs, such as racist and sexist ones. The problem with holding people responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an “undesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities; second, it is not clear what responsibility we have for beliefs .simpliciter.; and third, inherent in discussions of socially constructed ignorance (like white ignorance) is the idea that society is structured in such a way that white people are made deliberately unaware of their ignorance, which suggests their racial beliefs are not epistemically blameworthy.? ?.This book explores each of these topics with the aim of establishing the nature of undesirable beliefs and our responsibility for these beliefs with the understanding that there may well be (rare) occasions when undesirable beliefs are not epistemically culpable.?.
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞Involuntarism; Ignorance; Responsibility; Belief; Racism; Sexism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41858-7
isbn_softcover978-3-031-41860-0
isbn_ebook978-3-031-41858-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:12:45 | 只看該作者
Book 2023le responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an “undesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities; second, it is not clear what responsibility we have for beliefs .simpliciter.; and third, inherent in discussions of socially constructed ignorance (like
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:04:10 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:32:37 | 只看該作者
Yuanqing Xia,Mengyin Fu,Peng Shi usually available to us. At times, however, we find ourselves caught within epistemic communities that have limited evidence or that actively exclude outside voices. Does that mean that I can be absolved of responsibility for the influences that affect my beliefs? At times, perhaps, yes. My undesirable beliefs may not be . fault.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:11:05 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:02:24 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:12 | 只看該作者
What Is Undesirable Belief?,emic communities. Furthermore, treating fact and value as inseparable entails that the undesirability of a belief cannot be entirely dictated from outside of the epistemological framework within which that belief is held. Thus, what one epistemic community finds undesirable, another community will f
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:58:20 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:07:16 | 只看該作者
What About the Exculpatory Effects of Ignorance?,While a variety of ignorances exist, some ignorance is a socially constructed obfuscatory practice. When this occurs, individuals may not reasonably be expected to know any better—and if we can’t know better, then there is an important sense in which we are not responsible. In systemically racist or
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:33:59 | 只看該作者
,It’s Not , Fault,s social epistemology, a tension exists between the community and the individual. Epistemic communities are said to be the primary agents of knowledge. So, are . epistemic agents actually responsible for holding undesirable beliefs? This depends on the epistemological dynamic between communities and
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
仙居县| 孟连| 闸北区| 昭平县| 澄城县| 马关县| 木里| 瓦房店市| 克拉玛依市| 石楼县| 浦城县| 白玉县| 河池市| 宁陵县| 聊城市| 柳河县| 密山市| 阳高县| 南投县| 克拉玛依市| 磴口县| 阿拉尔市| 贵定县| 雷州市| 射阳县| 喀喇沁旗| 临桂县| 大宁县| 铜川市| 闽侯县| 军事| 陆川县| 贡觉县| 砀山县| 通山县| 资阳市| 东城区| 三明市| 集贤县| 随州市| 孟州市|