找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism; Unwinding the Braid Steven Bland Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 30600|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:34:15 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism
副標(biāo)題Unwinding the Braid
編輯Steven Bland
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313316/313316.mp4
概述Introduces a new strategy for resisting epistemic relativism.Written in an accessible style.Explores much of the recent scholarship on epistemic relativism
圖書封面Titlebook: Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism; Unwinding the Braid Steven Bland Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl
描述.This book confronts the threats of epistemic relativism and Pyrrhonian scepticism to analytic philosophy.? Epistemic relativists reject absolute notions of knowledge and justification, while sceptics claim that knowledge and justification of any kind are unattainable.? If either of these views is correct, then there can be no objective basis for thinking that one set of methods does a better job of delivering accurate information than any other set of methods. Philosophers have generally sought to resist these threats by responding to the argument that seems to motivate both positions: the Agrippan trilemma.? Steven Bland argues that this is a mistaken strategy. He surveys the most influential responses to the Agrippan trilemma, and shows that none of them succeeds in undermining epistemic relativism.? Bland also offers a new, dialectical strategy of challenging epistemic relativism by uncovering how epistemic methods depend on one another for their applications.? By means of this novel analysis, the book concludes that there are principled reasons to prefer naturalistic to non-naturalistic methods, even if these reasons do little to ease the threat of scepticism..
出版日期Book 2018
關(guān)鍵詞scepticism; skepticism; Pyrrhonian; naturalism; Wittgenstein
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-06895-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-94673-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International P
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism and Scepticism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:25:08 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:27:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94673-3scepticism; skepticism; Pyrrhonian; naturalism; Wittgenstein
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:32:45 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:29:42 | 只看該作者
Conclusions,an scepticism, nor is it a response to the underdetermination and semantic arguments for epistemic relativism. If it succeeds only in undermining the principal argument for epistemic relativism, then it will have done its job.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:13:38 | 只看該作者
,Tosio Kato’s Unpublished Paper,. Philosophers have traditionally attempted to neutralize both threats by means of a common response to this argument. The chapter surveys a number of such responses before outlining a more promising, dialectical argument against epistemic relativism that has no anti-sceptical ambitions. In doing so
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:24:52 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:10:19 | 只看該作者
Magnetic Composites in Electric Motors,ess by invoking the non-inferential justification of basic beliefs, while coherentists do so by introducing a non-linear conception of justification. While both of these positions focus on the possibility of justifying beliefs, neither of them can establish the trustworthiness of basic epistemic met
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:09:13 | 只看該作者
Vassil Palankovski,Rüdiger Quaywith arguments for the trustworthiness of a method that rely on the deliverances of that same method. By denying that epistemically circular arguments are vicious, externalists reject the Agrippan challenge rather than answering it. While this may be a viable response to Pyrrhonian scepticism, it ca
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:33:29 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-26 15:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
五大连池市| 博白县| 永平县| 忻州市| 民县| 赤城县| 松阳县| 定陶县| 县级市| 平昌县| 通渭县| 康马县| 夹江县| 得荣县| 罗平县| 赞皇县| 玉龙| 洛浦县| 宁夏| 高雄市| 西林县| 繁峙县| 福清市| 甘德县| 铅山县| 阿巴嘎旗| 大埔县| 肇州县| 商南县| 黔东| 南乐县| 宝鸡市| 民丰县| 专栏| 扎兰屯市| 盖州市| 长乐市| 藁城市| 高邑县| 册亨县| 丰顺县|