找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Relativism; A Constructive Criti Markus Seidel Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 Epis

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 21653|回復(fù): 38
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:48:15 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Epistemic Relativism
副標(biāo)題A Constructive Criti
編輯Markus Seidel
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313315/313315.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Epistemic Relativism; A Constructive Criti Markus Seidel Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 Epis
描述Markus Seidel provides a detailed critique of epistemic relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In addition to scrutinizing the main arguments for epistemic relativism?he provides an absolutist account that nevertheless aims at integrating the relativist‘s intuition.
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Epistemic relativism; relativism; sociology of science; SSK; underdetermination; Strong Programme; epistem
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377890
isbn_softcover978-1-349-47806-4
isbn_ebook978-1-137-37789-0
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Epistemic Relativism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Relativism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:53:15 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:15:09 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:48:22 | 只看該作者
,Epistemic Absolutism That Can Accommodate the Relativist’s Intuition,re the only possible alternatives in play once we ask the question of the status of correctness of epistemic norms — then, we are led to conclude, we should be epistemic absolutists. However, it might be objected that my treatment of the question of epistemic relativism was only negative — what then is my own proposal?
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:44:58 | 只看該作者
Introduction,discuss mainly the position of the two sociologists Barry Barnes and David Bloor, I think that the arguments that I discuss are the main arguments to be found in the literature on epistemic relativism in general.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:00:04 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:11:48 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:13:49 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:23:31 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:56:16 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-26 22:11
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
句容市| 华阴市| 清水河县| 万荣县| 眉山市| 铁岭市| 江山市| 江阴市| 宣威市| 禄丰县| 舟山市| 阿瓦提县| 易门县| 平原县| 东丽区| 巧家县| 新干县| 通道| 南川市| 嵊泗县| 宜州市| 怀安县| 临湘市| 台北市| 安达市| 突泉县| 商丘市| 比如县| 隆尧县| 定远县| 柳州市| 都匀市| 深圳市| 邛崃市| 玛多县| 高邮市| 宿迁市| 唐海县| 庆城县| 文成县| 介休市|