Titlebook: Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge; Hamid Vahid Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

Boycott

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

騎師

豎琴

separate

改革運(yùn)動(dòng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71242-6the debate there are those epistemologists (internalists) who require the justifying factors of a belief to be cognitively accessible to the agent. Accordingly, something can be regarded as a justifier, that is, confer justification on a belief only if it is reflectively accessible to the subject. E

雄偉

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513907he idea behind the problem is that any attempt at attaining epistemically justified beliefs incurs the charge of circularity or vicious regress. To be more precise, what the problem of the criterion highlights is the difficulty arising from trying to determine the extent of knowledge (justified beli

Genome

蘆筍

暗指

Locale

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511422ing dogmatically to one’s beliefs is epistemically preposterous, it would be equally unreasonable, it is said, to change them in the absence of any good reasons. This position known as epistemic conservatism seems to have had a distinguished line of advocates among the likes of Quine and Chisholm. A