找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Fixate
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:36:18 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:21:43 | 只看該作者
2946-2738 theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy,
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:16:58 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:19:23 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2akers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality should go deeper than just the formal politics, rejecting Estlund’s view and claiming that the informal political sphere (e.g. contributions to political campaigns) should be more egalitarian as well.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:34:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:16:15 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:10:48 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:37:56 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:15:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1ld not give greater political authority to any specific group of citizens. This can be claimed only if one adopts a non-monistic account of political legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:03:00 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 15:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
喀什市| 泰宁县| 鱼台县| 堆龙德庆县| 奉化市| 乡城县| 右玉县| 察雅县| 四子王旗| 宁城县| 卫辉市| 丹棱县| 兴海县| 承德县| 霍林郭勒市| 德惠市| 周口市| 吉林省| 专栏| 革吉县| 泸溪县| 宝应县| 河津市| 观塘区| 西峡县| 离岛区| 含山县| 拜城县| 多伦县| 那曲县| 南昌市| 南部县| 东丽区| 天津市| 永吉县| 仁化县| 嵩明县| 洪泽县| 井研县| 刚察县| 敖汉旗|