Titlebook: Environmental Standards; Scientific Foundatio K. Pinkau,K. Decker,F. E. Weinert Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998 Ris

生手

書目名稱Environmental Standards影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Environmental Standards影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Standards網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Environmental Standards網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Standards被引頻次




書目名稱Environmental Standards被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Standards年度引用




書目名稱Environmental Standards年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Standards讀者反饋




書目名稱Environmental Standards讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

拖網(wǎng)

Scientific-Medical Foundations of Radiation Protection,sult of decades of intensive research. The case of radiation protection is thus rather outstanding with respect to completeness and reliability of its foundations. Political practice will often require that standards are based on a less solid basis of knowledge. It is exactly for this reason, howeve

Chivalrous

excursion

Individual, Social and Governmental Risk Assessment,ically and react (or do not react) to them. How this happens does not only depend on our information level, our sensitivity towards hazards, our general value attitudes and our specific attitudes, but also on social processes of influencing, the dynamics of public opinion and collective convictions.

FLAT

Harass

Conclusion,ative directions to cope with consequences of technologies or, more generally speaking, with consequences of actions in their effect on the environment. Such regulative directions are necessary, since the carrying capacity of the system environment is no longer unlimited as to consequences of the ma

Harass

Necessity and Function of Environmental Standards,ces provide an indispensable foundation for the establishment of environmental standards. General social conditions are, in the first place, relevant for an understanding of the ?environment“ of humans, which is by no means a culturally variant quantity (1.1).

雇傭兵

血統(tǒng)

Formal Criteria and Instruments for the Decision Process,cuses on working out rational evaluation procedures and developing instruments that can become effective in the social decision process. Its reflections orient by the question how far the limits of a scientific way of proceeding can be extended in the face of the social decision processes described in chapter 4.

空洞

Book 1998rticles related to this topic. They may even agree on a jointly written introduction or conclusion . The study group "Environmental Standards" established in 1987 as an expert panel of the German Academy of Sciences and Technology in Berlin broke with that common tradition and became involved in a f