Titlebook: Environmental Organizations and Reasoned Discourse; Richard M. Robinson Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

阻擋

correspondent

Our Reasoned Environmental Discourse, construction. This is a political process that leads to our practical norms for “fair and reasoned discourse,” e.g., this discourse should be informed, inclusive of the opinions of those affected, uncorrupted by personal and direct conflicts of interest, and logical in premises and deductions. From

冥想后

,Recognizing Environmental Duties and Applying Our “Fair and Reasoned” Criteria,propositions of (i) mutual dependence, (ii) the necessity of obtaining and applying knowledge of our environmental impacts, and (iii) the global environmental community. The chapter then examines the duty-based discourse criteria of O’Neill, and also Habermas, but in the context of environmental con

甜得發(fā)膩

Schlemms-Canal

avulsion

Accrue

Some Rhetoric of Environmental Equity and Economic Efficiency,on, and restoration. Society’s conceptions of economic efficiency, especially the effects of both negative and positive externalities, form much of the substance of this rhetoric. This rhetoric also includes the distributional effects of these externalities. This chapter reviews some of this neoclas

Overstate

天然熱噴泉

,The Current State of Environmental Discourse: Is It “Fair” or Otherwise?,; i.e., whether this discourse was inclusive (or paternalistic), fully informed, logical, and uncorrupted. The discourse examples addressed here concern (i) “clean coal” and its associated “acid rain,” (ii) agriculturally caused water pollution and its associated “dead zones,” (iii) gas and oil dril

犬儒主義者

,Some Environmental Organizations and Their “Fair and Reasoned” Contributions,a River Gorge, the (3) Chesapeake Bay Foundation, and the (4) Riverkeepers coalition. They all illustrate the fundamental theme of this monograph, i.e., that our nongovernment environmental advocacy organizations and coalitions are necessary to satisfy the “fair and reasoned criteria” we require of