Titlebook: Environmental Law and American Business; Dilemmas of Complian Joseph F. DiMento Book 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986 air

Accolade

The Actors,ons. To understand compliance one must understand variation among the individuals and groups involved in the regulatory process. Variations among people who fill roles in government, in the business firm, and in advocacy groups are especially significant when norms are both divergent and in transition. This is the case in environmental law.

diabetes

Flawless

Making Environmental Law Work,ronmental affairs of a large corporation, a resident of a community that has been polluted by a neighboring industry, the technical consultant to a legal suit involving unacceptable disposal techniques all have different views of the compliance problem.

APO

exclamation

漂泊

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32077-5ystem, the almost unavoidable conclusion is that laws do not function smoothly because of a weak or nonexistent enforcement approach. Not enough violators are identified; when identified, not enough are sanctioned; and when they are sanctioned, penalties are insufficiently severe to communicate the

織物

Mercantile

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18093-9gulations promulgated by bureaucrats who do not possess adequate knowledge of the private sector. Legal counsel to an environmental agency concludes that the pollution problem would be solved if government more efficiently ai;d aggressively enforced major regulatory laws. The vice-president for envi

精致

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0565-9air; air pollution; environment; environmental law; pollution; water

Exposition

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05786-3ronmental laws are so legislated and so administered that meaningful compliance is rare. Statistics on noncompliance (Chapters 1 and 2) and arguments against strategies for getting compliance (Chapter 3) generate negative views of the efficacy of environmental law.