Titlebook: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis; Contributions from t Vincent T. Covello,Jeryl L. Mumpower,V. R.

HAVEN

書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis被引頻次




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis年度引用




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis讀者反饋




書目名稱Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

典型

Culpable

按等級

IOTA

Social and Behavioral Research on Risk: Uses in Risk Management Decisionmakingent approaches. As part of this effort, social and behavioral scientists have produced a substantial body of knowledge on public risk perceptions, attitudes, and behavior (see Covello. 1983). The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe five critical policy uses for such information (see Ta

腫塊

腫塊

Assessing Long-Range Cumulative Impacts” While the emphasis is on the first, a number of pertinent remarks are made with regard to EIA, TA, and RA in order to exemplify an underlying thrust as to “assessment” efforts. At the same time, heavy emphasis is placed on assessment associated with natural resources management, public projects, a

rheumatology

有偏見

Opportunities for the Social Sciences in Risk Analysis—An Engineer’s Viewpointing problem. Engineering safety factors were and still are a basic feature of the design of any structure, and these safety factors were institutionalized into codes and standards. Those risks which remained inherent in engineering designs were considered to be tolerable residuals, and were not expl

補(bǔ)充

A Critical Companion to Spenser Studies” While the emphasis is on the first, a number of pertinent remarks are made with regard to EIA, TA, and RA in order to exemplify an underlying thrust as to “assessment” efforts. At the same time, heavy emphasis is placed on assessment associated with natural resources management, public projects, and environmental hazards.