Titlebook: Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea; Michael Gilek,Mikael Karlsson,Katarzyna Smolarz Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable

BUCK

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81315-2s and stakeholder disagreements. The analyses reveal differences and similarities in institutional and organisational designs of the respective assessment-management interactions, as well as in terms of how scientific uncertainties, stakeholder disagreements and sociopolitical ambiguities are addres

glacial

Hitlers Rede auf dem Erntedankfest 1937,a number of different barriers and obstacles. Our key result from this study is that BSR consists of many national institutions for risk communication, but that there are hardly any centralised institutions for risk communication activities relating to environmental governance in the region. Another

deadlock

Aneignung und Kompetenzentwicklunge pertinent in the eutrophication case to address the complexity of nutrient pollution sources by adapting objectives and measures amongst sectoral policies to be in line with environmental ones. Furthermore, cross-case comparisons reveal a set of common vital functions (i.e. coordination, integrati

Bravado

2212-6260 cation andparticipation. Based on these cross-case comparisons, this book also draws a set of general conclusions on possible ways of improving the governance of the Baltic Sea by promoting what are identified 978-3-319-80056-1978-3-319-27006-7Series ISSN 2212-6260 Series E-ISSN 2212-6279

Fibrin

978-3-319-80056-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

cyanosis

sultry

Ezra Pound and the Problem of Audience,mical pollution, overfishing and invasive alien species). Despite several years of substantial efforts by state and non-state actors, it is still highly unlikely that the regionally agreed environmental objectives of reaching “good environmental status” by 2021 in the HELCOM BSAP (Baltic Sea Action

Osmosis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55920-4fficient for implementing the ecosystem approach to management (EAM) in the case of Baltic Sea eutrophication. Concerning governance structures, a number of institutions and policies focus on issues relating to eutrophication. In many cases, the policies are mutually supportive rather than contradic

peptic-ulcer

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9684-1s and opportunities for improving sustainability in this sector. Fisheries management in the Baltic Sea is politically and culturally complex, institutionally fragmented and confronted with serious environmental problems, such as recent shifts in cod stocks. The central challenge is therefore to est

bisphosphonate

”Nomadity of Being” in Central Asiaa high level of uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity. In the Baltic Sea region, legislation and policies related to invasive alien species (IAS) are still under development, and as a consequence, there are a few legally binding instruments dealing with the problem. Due to the fact that environmenta