Titlebook: Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems; Dietrich F. Burkhardt,William H. Ittelson Book 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New

GUAFF

書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems被引頻次




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems年度引用




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems讀者反饋




書目名稱Environmental Assessment of Socioeconomic Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Consensus

FLOAT

Book 1978pollution of the natural environment (water, air and soil) by producing, using and consuming the products of our industrialized economy, - the forseeable exhaustion of natural resources by continuing the increase of industrial production. Most of the recent activities, both in research and in admini

博識(shí)

Systematic Distortion in Planning and Assessmente commentator as “the conventional wisdom strikes back”. Economists were first into the fray, propelled by a fear that acceptance of limits to growth would render much of their stock in trade valueless, and uninhibited by any real knowledge of how the physical world actually works.

vocation

Urologist

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08176-0e commentator as “the conventional wisdom strikes back”. Economists were first into the fray, propelled by a fear that acceptance of limits to growth would render much of their stock in trade valueless, and uninhibited by any real knowledge of how the physical world actually works.

Urologist

Truculent

枕墊

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08176-0uld terminate in catastrophic collapse, made a substantial impact on public opinion. This was speedily followed by a counter-reaction, described by one commentator as “the conventional wisdom strikes back”. Economists were first into the fray, propelled by a fear that acceptance of limits to growth

寡頭政治

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30281-8uent to disasters, political revolutions, and wars. Whenever standards and customary patterns of behaviour are undermined, whenever beaten tracks are blurred, and whenever there is a shortage of goods and services, we are quite ready to welcome new ideas and procedures, to accept new goods and to le