Titlebook: Enhancing Police Integrity; Carl B. Klockars,Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovi?,M. R. Haber Book 2007 Springer-Verlag New York 2007 code of silence.pol

MAZE

The Practice of Correctional Psychologyll not only because just such an effort was the objective of this research but also because the definition of “integrity” employed in this research intentionally restrained some of the concept’s most lofty ambitions.

抱負(fù)

Profiles of Integrity,the environment of integrity in each. The National Institute of Justice funded an eighteen-month field study of three agencies from our sample: Charleston, South Carolina; Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina; and St. Petersburg, Florida.

regale

榮幸

Enhancing Police Integrity,ll not only because just such an effort was the objective of this research but also because the definition of “integrity” employed in this research intentionally restrained some of the concept’s most lofty ambitions.

正式演說

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3435-6se “integrity” also has some exceptionally valuable, but rather subtle additional powers that ought to be preserved. To save it from a fate of pleasant meaninglessness and to expose some of its considerable powers, we offer a detailed definition.

blister

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3437-0uestionnaire presented police officers with eleven hypothetical case scenarios. The scenarios, displayed in Exhibit 2.1, cover a range of corrupt behavior from that which merely gives an appearance of a conflict of interest (Case 1) to incidents of bribery (Case 3) and theft (Cases 5 and 11).

心胸開闊

Grievance

The Practical Real-Time Enterpriselowed the good question we had come to expect in response: “What do you mean by integrity?” When we rephrased the question as “Does the administration or do the officers in this agency tolerate corruption or other misconduct?” the answer was, without exception, “No, they do not.”

轉(zhuǎn)向

narcotic

The Practice of Consumer Exposure Assessmenth as theft, bribery, and the use or sale of illicit drugs. While a somewhat more fuzzy line distinguished excessive from reasonable force, the study groups believed (and our surveys in their agency support them in these beliefs) that officers in their agencies simply would not tolerate what they considered to be excessive force by fellow officers.