Titlebook: English Society in the Later Middle Ages; Class, Status and Ge S. H. Rigby Textbook 1995Latest edition S. H. Rigby 1995 England.ideology.Mi

半身雕像

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49289-6tential to provoke a response in the form of the usurpationary struggles of those who are excluded. Unlike the social consensus emphasised by functionalist stratification theory (see above, p. 7), closure theorists thus tend to see the relationship between classes ‘a(chǎn)s one of permanent tension and mu

Euthyroid

fodlder

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56724-6ogists and historians, to apply this kind of class-based analysis to societies such as medieval England involves an anachronistic imposition of our own preconceptions about society onto people who saw social relations in ways which differed markedly from those which seem obvious to us. For such writ

軍械庫(kù)

The Multiverse of Office Fictionand (chapter 5), this does . mean that we need abandon the concept of stratification by social order and simply analyse medieval society in terms of its class relations and property rights. On the contrary, the view of medieval England as a society of orders does serve an extremely useful purpose in

Obscure

Intervention

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87836-8y which specific social groups gain a privileged position for themselves at the expense of other groups can be grounded in ‘virtually any attribute — race, language, social origin, religion’. Closure in such cases is dependent upon inclusion within, or exclusion from, a status-group whose members sh

FELON

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07695-6d status-group. But how were such forms of exclusion maintained and reproduced? One answer, in the case of gender in particular, is that contemporary forms of exclusion themselves divided those who were excluded, preventing the emergence of any sense of shared identity or common interest on the part

易怒