Titlebook: English Literary Sexology; Translations of Inve Heike Bauer Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009 c

hallow

ZEST

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11277-7 of Shakespeare’s sonnets (concluding that the poet’s allusions to malemale love were mere expressions of friendship), before moving on to compare Havelock Ellis to Ovid. The author argues that Ellis is ‘concerned with artistry in sex’, praising his ‘unrighteousness’, and claiming that it ‘has done

有花

秘方藥

botany

When Sex Is Gender: Feminist Inversion and the Limits of Same-Sex Theory,lf-negating, submissive image of middle-class Ideal Womanhood’.. Precisely ‘who or what the New Woman of the 1880s and 1890s was’, as Ruth Robbins has recently argued, ‘very much depended on who was defining her’, which neatly sums up the diversity of both historical New Woman discourses and modern

裁決

Stephen Gordon Super-Invert: The Sexology of Radclyffe Hall,sm including recent studies of lesbianism by Laura Doan, Terry Castle, Erin Carlston and Joanne Winning, has shown the importance of explorations of sexuality, especially, female same-sex desire, for writers such as Katherine Mansfield, May Sinclair, Natalie Barney, Djuna Barnes, Gertrude Stein and

慷慨援助

judiciousness

2634-6494 ‘ translated and transmitted into English culture? This study provides an examination of the formation of sexual theory between the 1860s and 1930s and its migration across national and disciplinary boundaries.978-0-230-23408-6Series ISSN 2634-6494 Series E-ISSN 2634-6508

遭受

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05112-0 that from the outset was so heavily dominated by male experts and lay readers? In short, what were the kinds of narratives that first made up the ., and what do their translations reveal about the links between the discourses of sexuality and the experiential realities of the sexual theorists, and their gendering?

CANON

Introduction, that from the outset was so heavily dominated by male experts and lay readers? In short, what were the kinds of narratives that first made up the ., and what do their translations reveal about the links between the discourses of sexuality and the experiential realities of the sexual theorists, and their gendering?