找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Engineering Decisions for Life Quality; How Safe is Safe Eno J. S. Nathwani,N. C. Lind,M. D. Pandey Book 2009 Springer-Verlag London 2009 D

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 35878|回復(fù): 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:40:10 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality
副標(biāo)題How Safe is Safe Eno
編輯J. S. Nathwani,N. C. Lind,M. D. Pandey
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/311/310748/310748.mp4
概述Presents a rational procedure to assess public risks on a universal yardstick such that the outcome is in the public interest.Includes supplementary material:
叢書名稱Springer Series in Reliability Engineering
圖書封面Titlebook: Engineering Decisions for Life Quality; How Safe is Safe Eno J. S. Nathwani,N. C. Lind,M. D. Pandey Book 2009 Springer-Verlag London 2009 D
描述.Engineering Decisions for Life Quality: How Safe is Safe Enough?. provides a foundation and a theoretical basis for managing risk to an acceptable level under the real-world constraint of limited resources. The focus is not on risks as such, but on what can be done to maximize the positive outcomes of risk in terms of improvements to the quality of life....The principal focus of .Engineering Decisions for Life Quality: How Safe is Safe Enough?. is on the development of guidance for establishing rational standards of practice. Standards should meet the requirement of utilizing resources to achieve the maximum net overall benefit to society within society’s capacity to commit such resources....The ideas discussed within this book will be of interest to engineers; advanced undergraduate and graduate students; public health officials; and risk specialists..
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Decision-making; Life Quality Index (LQI); Managing Risk; Public Health; RM; Societal Capacity to Commit
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-602-1
isbn_softcover978-1-4471-2511-2
isbn_ebook978-1-84882-602-1Series ISSN 1614-7839 Series E-ISSN 2196-999X
issn_series 1614-7839
copyrightSpringer-Verlag London 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality被引頻次




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality年度引用




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality讀者反饋




書目名稱Engineering Decisions for Life Quality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:43:07 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:12:14 | 只看該作者
Judging Risks Using the Life Quality Method,l impacts on individual welfare and the quality of life. The approach transcends traditional cost–benefit analysis by drawing into account demographics, economic productivity, and life safety impacts. Here we illustrate the computational procedures required to develop the guidance in practical conte
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:42:49 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:48:42 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:01:47 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:56:11 | 只看該作者
Optimal Design of a Flood Protection Levee, designed to a fuzzy quantity called the PMF (“probable” maximum flood). Proper probabilistic design is preferable, but it requires that hydrological data be translated into a . flood probability distribution. It is inadequate merely to do a conventional estimation of the distribution, since the app
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:00:41 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:33:26 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41635-5 Work creates wealth, but it also adds to, and creates, risk to life, health, and the environment. We take a good portion of that wealth and use it to reduce those risks. How big should that portion be, and how should it be distributed over the hundreds of risk-reducing options? We can answer this q
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:03:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-15 19:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
洪江市| 曲水县| 曲麻莱县| 瑞金市| 淮安市| 津市市| 洛宁县| 九龙坡区| 莒南县| 北流市| 女性| 海伦市| 南和县| 盐津县| 西乡县| 茂名市| 鸡泽县| 沙湾县| 西充县| 莒南县| 玉树县| 邻水| 元氏县| 罗江县| 菏泽市| 湖北省| 石家庄市| 云霄县| 名山县| 北川| 广德县| 乐至县| 噶尔县| 托克托县| 古蔺县| 宜昌市| 湘潭市| 贡嘎县| 岳普湖县| 鄂托克前旗| 承德县|