Titlebook: Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality between Facts and Norms; Markus Christen,Carel van Schaik,Carmen Tanner Book 2014 Springer Internati

GRATE

Myelin

Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy,aper I intend to answer this question positively. An exhaustive defense of this assertion demands, of course, more than I can offer in this paper. I can, nevertheless, offer a portion of what I think is necessary for this notion to be considered plausible and an outline of the way it may work. Thus

neutral-posture

Graduated

LUDE

https://doi.org/10.1007/b138741eling, we have been able to make progress on old philosophical questions about the nature of morality. For example, much recent research has lent support to the view that emotions are integral to moral judgment. Unsurprisingly, empirical research in ethics has tended to be reductionist: the loftiest

Delirium

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29708-1nt similar transgressions in the future. In this chapter, we argue that beyond cultural and contextual influences, changes do also require agents who are skilled in how to deal with moral issues and how to turn moral standards into actions. In order to specify the abilities that facilitate moral fun

不要嚴(yán)酷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18965-5an brain. After giving a brief overview about psychological models of moral judgment and behavior, we introduce the neuroscience approach and the methods applied to the study of the “moral brain,” including the examination of brain damaged patients, neuroimaging, and neurostimulation. Then, we prese

aristocracy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08918-4gy shows that a certain common belief derives from epistemically defective processes, then this threatens to undercut the epistemic authority of the belief. The canonical case of this sort of debunking argument is Freud’s critique of religion (1927). Freud argues that religious belief is a product o

僵硬

Thermorégulation, propriétés radiativesdingly. In other cases, we feel the need for more extensive deliberation of a moral case. After a judgment is made, we have to ask: Can we justify our moral view to others who may have come to a different conclusion? A main theory that is put forward to seek justifiable resolutions is Reflective Equ

HACK