Titlebook: Empirical Studies in Comparative Politics; Melvin J. Hinich,Michael C. Munger Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 Ins

explicit

ALE

高興一回

,The “revival of communism” or the effect of institutions?: The 1993 Polish parliamentary elections,oland. We show that the shift to the left was insufficient to assure post-communists an electoral victory, and that this victory would not have happened under the old electoral law or under a unified coalition of the Right. Our results show the high sensitivity of emerging democracies to the details of their institutional backbones.

牢騷

A spatial analysis of candidate competition in dual member districts: The 1989 Chilean senatorial es bases of party and candidate support and the underlying dimensions of political competition. Spatial analysis reveals both change and continuity in the pre- and post-authoritarian electoral universes.

TOXIN

oke a conscious effort to compare, and investigate,the public choice of comparative politics. .There have been many publications by public choice scholars, and manymore by researchers who are at least sympathetic to the public choiceperspective, yet little of this work has been integrated into the m

jocular

Philosophie und kleine Geschichte der Markeg a majority over another party may receive less seats. The second states that a Condorcet winner may not receive the largest number of seats and even may not receive a seat at all. The third says that the majority relation may be the reverse of the ranking of parties in terms of numbers of seats.

Annotate

978-1-4419-5072-7Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

anagen

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09147-7pairwise comparisons of the five German parties (1995 survey data for West and East Germany). Neither in West nor in East Germany, a party gains the absolute majority of voters’ preferences. We derive coalition preferences from the party rankings; the governing coalition of CDU/CSU and FDP is not th

Toxoid-Vaccines

是剝皮

Gottfried Vosgerau,Nicolas Lindneral model and the familiar proximity model. The directional model implies that voters ask two questions of parties: Are you on my side? and Can I trust you to be responsible? This contrasts with the classic proximity question: How close are your positions to mine?.Prior analysis of Norwegian voters h