找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Empirical Justification; Paul K. Moser Book 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1985 bibliography.cognitivism.conflicts.

[復制鏈接]
查看: 50439|回復: 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:31:23 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Empirical Justification
編輯Paul K. Moser
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/309/308864/308864.mp4
叢書名稱Philosophical Studies Series
圖書封面Titlebook: Empirical Justification;  Paul K. Moser Book 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1985 bibliography.cognitivism.conflicts.
描述Broadly speaking, this is a book about truth and the criteria thereof. Thus it is, in a sense, a book about justification and rationality. But it does not purport to be about the notion of justification or the notion of rationality. For the assumption that there is just one notion of justification, or just one notion of rationality, is, as the book explains, very misleading. Justification and rationality come in various kinds. And to that extent, at least, we should recognize a variety of notions of justification and rationality. This, at any rate, is one of the morals of Chapter VI. This book, in Chapters I-V, is mainly concerned with the kind of justification and rationality characteristic of a truth-seeker, specifically a seeker of truth about the world impinging upon the senses: the so-called empirical world. Hence the book‘s title. But since the prominent contemporary approaches to empirical justification are many and varied, so also are the epistemological issues taken up in the following chapters. For instance, there will be questions about so-called coherence and its role, if any, in empirical justification. And there will be questions about social consensus (whatever it is
出版日期Book 1985
關鍵詞bibliography; cognitivism; conflicts; foundation; knowledge; media; probability; rationality; skepticism; sub
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4526-5
isbn_softcover978-90-277-2042-9
isbn_ebook978-94-009-4526-5Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349
issn_series 0921-8599
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1985
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Empirical Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Empirical Justification影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Empirical Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Empirical Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Empirical Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Empirical Justification被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Empirical Justification年度引用




書目名稱Empirical Justification年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Empirical Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Empirical Justification讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:28:09 | 只看該作者
Pflege bei venoven?ser H?mofiltrationot founded”.. If we construe Wittgenstein’s claim as stating that at the foundation of . beliefs lie beliefs that are ., then we have the first purported solution to the epistemic regress problem. The contextualist solution, like the foundationalist solution, proposes that evidence chains terminate,
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:51:53 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:58:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:32:04 | 只看該作者
Pflegeroboter aus Sicht der Geriatrie, for its reliance on the doctrine of the epistemological given. Since there are various notions of the given in circulation, there are also various versions of intuitionism. To circumscribe the relevant versions of epistemic intuitionism, I find it useful to distinguish four general kinds of given:
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:06:40 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4526-5bibliography; cognitivism; conflicts; foundation; knowledge; media; probability; rationality; skepticism; sub
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:50:35 | 只看該作者
978-90-277-2042-9D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1985
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:33:26 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:26:13 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:19:28 | 只看該作者
Justification and the Regress Problem,interest to believe that he can swim to safety — for given that belief, he will continue to swim and might be rescued — he is, presumably, prudentially justified in believing that he can swim to safety. Clearly, if he had no such belief, he would probably drown immediately, without even trying to re
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 13:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
荆门市| 成都市| 油尖旺区| 海淀区| 龙川县| 武川县| 泽州县| 和田县| 乐安县| 察隅县| 建昌县| 祁连县| 寻甸| 通河县| 云霄县| 临桂县| 禄丰县| 美姑县| 南江县| 广安市| 临桂县| 天全县| 洛宁县| 仪征市| 盘锦市| 静海县| 从江县| 襄垣县| 德格县| 蒙阴县| 河北省| 永州市| 商都县| 新源县| 柳江县| 东方市| 深州市| 宣汉县| 绥江县| 棋牌| 宣城市|