找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Empirical Evidence on the Macroeconomic Effects of EU Cohesion Policy; Philipp Mohl Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Economic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: FAULT
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:10:47 | 只看該作者
Introduction,, to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions, and to strengthen its “economic, social and territorial cohesion” (Art. 3(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEU)).
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:36:30 | 只看該作者
Econometric Evaluation of EU Cohesion Policy: A Survey,theoretical framework used to evaluate EU Cohesion Policy, discusses the main econometric issues and surveys the existing literature. Note that this chapter does not include a discussion on the question of whether or not and to what extent the Cohesion Policy may be effective from a theoretical point of view.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:55:32 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:06:17 | 只看該作者
Impact on Regional Employment,parities (measured, e.g. as GDP per capita), since income differences are, per definition, based on differences in the labour productivity and/or employment level, among other factors. In addition, parts of the EU expenditures (in particular Objective 2 payments) are directly aimed at reducing disparities in the employment sector.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:00:28 | 只看該作者
Does EU Cohesion Policy Really Increase Public Investment?, projects must not crowd out investment spending elsewhere (European Commission, 2007a). Thus, the EU Commission aims to ensure that Cohesion Policy payments do not replace domestically-financed public or structural expenditure.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:07:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04318-9etti, 2008), no statistically significant (for example, Dall’erba and Le Gallo, 2008) or even a negative impact (for example, Eggert, von Ehrlich, Fenge and K?nig, 2007; Checherita, Nickel and Rother, 2009).
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:22:27 | 只看該作者
Ad Hoc Networks for Health Monitoring,omic growth impact and has revealed mixed, if not contradictory, findings: the results range from positive growth effects (Beugelsdijk and Eijffinger, 2005), to no statistically significant (Dall’erba and Le Gallo, 2007) or even negative effects (Eggert, von Ehrlich, Fenge and K?nig, 2007).
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:05:08 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:51:54 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:26:41 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 07:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
富蕴县| 淮北市| 北海市| 清河县| 安远县| 涟水县| 岚皋县| 新兴县| 璧山县| 成武县| 体育| 双鸭山市| 乌兰县| 海安县| 安顺市| 阳谷县| 水富县| 杭州市| 五河县| 保靖县| 疏附县| 琼中| 张家港市| 咸丰县| 临清市| 衢州市| 青阳县| 西华县| 安乡县| 恩平市| 泰安市| 鹰潭市| 大安市| 宝山区| 兴和县| 扎赉特旗| 兴宁市| 施秉县| 井研县| 宜州市| 长宁县|