找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Emotions and Risky Technologies; Sabine Roeser Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 GM-foods.cloning.ethics.morality.nuclea

[復制鏈接]
查看: 32934|回復: 47
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:41:42 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies
編輯Sabine Roeser
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/309/308750/308750.mp4
概述The first book to address the new topic of moral emotions about risky technologies.Brings together empirical and normative-ethical viewpoints about risk and emotion.Brings together leading scholars fr
叢書名稱The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
圖書封面Titlebook: Emotions and Risky Technologies;  Sabine Roeser Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 GM-foods.cloning.ethics.morality.nuclea
描述“Acceptable Risk” – On the Rationality (and Irrationality) of Emotional Evaluations of Risk What is “acceptable risk”? That question is appropriate in a number of different contexts, political, social, ethical, and scienti c. Thus the question might be whether the voting public will support a risky proposal or project, whether people will buy or accept a risky product, whether it is morally permissible to pursue this or that potentially harmful venture, or whether it is wise or prudent to test or try out some possibly dangerous hypothesis or product. But complicating all of these queries, the “sand in the machinery” of rational decision-making, are the emotions. It is often noted (but too rarely studied) that voters are swayed by their passions at least as much as they are convinced by rational arguments. And it is obvious to advertisers and retailers that people are seduced by all sorts of appeals to their vanities, their fears, their extravagant hopes, their insecurities. At least one major thread of ethical discourse, the one following Kant, minimizes the importance of the emotions (“the inclinations”) in favor of an emphatically rational decision-making process, and it is worth
出版日期Book 2010
關鍵詞GM-foods; cloning; ethics; morality; nuclear energy; risk regulation; risky technologies
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8647-1
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3236-0
isbn_ebook978-90-481-8647-1Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036
issn_series 1875-0044
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies網絡公開度




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies被引頻次




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies年度引用




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies讀者反饋




書目名稱Emotions and Risky Technologies讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:45:57 | 只看該作者
Emotions Involved in Risk Perception: From Sociological and Psychological Risk Studies Towards a Neoin the first part as it was originally spelled out by risk sociology in the 1970s. On the meta-ethical level, this implies a (neo-) sentimentalist conception of risk. On the level of normative ethics, I will follow a recipient-oriented approach, supporting the thesis that emotional damage adds to the total amount of harmful consequences.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:57:17 | 只看該作者
1875-0044 s about risk and emotion.Brings together leading scholars fr“Acceptable Risk” – On the Rationality (and Irrationality) of Emotional Evaluations of Risk What is “acceptable risk”? That question is appropriate in a number of different contexts, political, social, ethical, and scienti c. Thus the quest
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:09:12 | 只看該作者
Book 2010 a number of different contexts, political, social, ethical, and scienti c. Thus the question might be whether the voting public will support a risky proposal or project, whether people will buy or accept a risky product, whether it is morally permissible to pursue this or that potentially harmful v
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:49:17 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:57:35 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:34:05 | 只看該作者
Mechanismen der Infektabwehr in der Lunge, really biases after all. If emotions bias our quantitative understanding of risk, we indeed need proper (accessibly presented) quantitative information. However, concerning the second kind of bias I will argue that we need emotions in order to correct our immoral emotions.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:58:09 | 只看該作者
Emotions as Aids and Obstacles in Thinking About Risky Technologiesing us to pay more attention to potential harm than the potential benefit of developing a given technology, or vice versa.? It may be necessary to use emotional debiasing strategies to counteract this “l(fā)uddite bias”.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:00:47 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:04:10 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 06:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
德惠市| 运城市| 淮南市| 井陉县| 阿拉善右旗| 鲁甸县| 平昌县| 五家渠市| 乌鲁木齐市| 玉环县| 常德市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 惠来县| 阳江市| 宿松县| 舟曲县| 陇川县| 申扎县| 徐州市| 峨山| 绥江县| 岑溪市| 怀安县| 莎车县| 盐亭县| 惠安县| 腾冲县| 武川县| 武定县| 温州市| 安顺市| 杭锦后旗| 如东县| 射洪县| 绥德县| 大丰市| 亳州市| 东明县| 都昌县| 岳西县| 临西县|