Titlebook: Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes; Henrik Lagerlund,Mikko Yrj?nsuuri Book 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002 Medieval philo

航天飛機(jī)

書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes被引頻次




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes年度引用




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes讀者反饋




書目名稱Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

PANG

和音

Free Will and Self-Control in Peter Olivi,e above question. Medievalists know Olivi as one of the fiercest defenders of the unlimited freedom of the human will, and he is probably the most original thinker in this discussion in the thirteenth century.

Exclude

鉤針織物

Pathology of Childhood and Adolescencebates about the nature of choice centered as much (if not more) on the issue of.than on its efficient causal cousin. The aim of this paper is to trace part of the story of the evolution of discussion of this issue and of the evolution of conceptions of choice and of freedom which paralleled it.

絆住

絆住

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9064-8ially distinct species of passion, sorted into two kinds and for the most part occurring in conjugate pairs — the six concupiscible passions of love and hate, desire and aversion, joy and sadness; the five irascible passions of hope and despair, confidence and fear, and, the lone passion with no counterpart, anger.

健壯

Introduction,d finally she also kills her two sons in a furious attempt of revenge on their father. Ever since this was written commentators have disagreed on how to understand Medea’s behavior. Why, in particular, does she claim that she knows better and acts for the worse? Are we really to believe that.of all people, has a weak will?

Terrace

Goodness and Rational Choice in the Early Middle Ages,bates about the nature of choice centered as much (if not more) on the issue of.than on its efficient causal cousin. The aim of this paper is to trace part of the story of the evolution of discussion of this issue and of the evolution of conceptions of choice and of freedom which paralleled it.

Pseudoephedrine

,Buridan’s Theory of Free Choice and Its Influence,ion, which includes Anselm and Ockham, challenge all three of these claims and argue that (iv) “the will is a self-mover”, (v) deliberation or choice is not only about means but also about ends, and (vi) the will has no necessary orientation towards the good..See Normore (1998).