Titlebook: Emerging Powers, Global Justice and International Economic Law; Reformers of an Unju Andreas Buser Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

怕失去錢

EVICT

有節(jié)制

Emerging Powers and International Investment Agreements,vestment law. Section?5.3 provides deeper insights into whether or not emerging power approaches to international investment law can be characterized as loyalist, reformist or even revolutionary, and whether their perspectives align with global justice demands.

ventilate

Emerging Powers and International Trade Law,de order and its law-making processes. In its third and main part (C.) the chapter examines several examples of how emerging powers have sought to make WTO agreements more just according to our three-dimensional human rights approach and whether they succeeded.

assail

Introduction: The Crisis of International Law and the Role of Emerging Powers,y fuelled by the natural crises of climate change and recently the spread of COVID-19 around the globe. This decline narrative is often associated with the diminished power of Western nations and the rise, or in some cases re-emergence, of ‘a(chǎn)uthoritarian’ states such as Russia and China.

柳樹；枯黃

Hegemony, Power and International Law,es increased power of emerging powers and their potential to influence international law. Finally, the chapter connects the phenomenon of emerging powers with earlier calls for a New International Economic Order and shows that BRICS keep with Third World rhetoric and argue for moderate reform.

Entropion

ANTIC

HATCH

Nerve Cells and Nervous Systemside us with criteria to evaluate rising power legal agendas. The second part of the chapter applies the ‘human rights approach’ to core norms and principles of international investment and trade law to provide a preliminary overview of the degree to which these legal regimes can be considered ‘just’

巨頭

Book 2021g powers provide for some alternative regulatory ideas, already leading to a diversification of international economic law. As a general rule, they tend to support norms that allow host States much policy space which could be used to protect and fulfil socio-economic human rights, especially – but n