Titlebook: Emerging Capitalism in Central Europe and Southeast Asia; A Comparison of Poli Fran?ois Bafoil Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

按等級

鄙視讀作

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32999-0ied, although they reveal significant internal differences. and are in fact not particularly similar to each other.. In addition, I use the term “region” to refer only to the supranational institutional entities of the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This

Hectic

與野獸博斗者

難聽的聲音

STALL

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75579-9uch as Cambodia. The term . is used to describe the economic situation in countries dominated by authoritarian, if not dictatorial, political groups that are customers of the zone’s big bosses,. who exert a significant influence over a narrow range of economic sectors, without, however, having an ad

聽寫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04015-7f the East German currency on July 1, 1990, a critical turning point in the transition from Soviet-style economies to market-based economies. This event was the prelude to a full embrace of social market economy principles and a fundamentally political form of market capitalism. These developments r

酷熱

critic

Guangxi Cao,Ling-Yun He,Jie Cao capitalist economic activity that occurred in the two regions reinforced the sovereignty and economic competitiveness of their member-states. One component of this broader subject is the question of whether EU and ASEAN expansion. extended the forms of capitalism that existed previously in Europe a

conquer