找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Electronic Participation; 5th IFIP WG 8.5 Inte Maria A. Wimmer,Efthimios Tambouris,Ann Macintosh Conference proceedings 2013 IFIP Internati

[復(fù)制鏈接]
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:32:58 | 只看該作者
Online Political Debate: Motivating Factors and Impact on Political Engagement participants reported that such an increase in political engagement could be due to the online environment providing a sense of influence, access to political debate, a means for getting updated, a lowered threshold for participation, motivating local political engagement, and awareness concerning political events.
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:56:21 | 只看該作者
You Say "Yes", I Say “No”: Capturing and Measuring ‘Public Opinion’ through Citizens’ Conversation Odly, which intersubjective solidarities (groups) participants form around these issues. The paper concludes by considering both the epistemic and pragmatic aspects of such results for better understanding the participatory value of public discussions online from a perspective of discursive sociology and public trust building.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:15:17 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:20:19 | 只看該作者
Targeted Policy Making by Transforming Social Networks this is by exploiting online social networks. The tremendous impact of social networks in everyday life (e.g. obesity, financial situation, smoking etc.) is now well established in the literature. However, up to now, the impact of online social networks in policy making has not been thoroughly inve
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:07:47 | 只看該作者
Crisis, Innovation and e-Participation: Towards a Framework for Comparative Research the aim of investigating this question, we introduce a framework for comparative research that includes not only systemic but also circumstantial factors. The approach is tested in a comparative case study of three northern European countries–Sweden, Estonia and Iceland–that are all experimenting w
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 11:31:41 | 只看該作者
E-Participation among American Local Governments.k.a. e-democracy). The results show that few American local governments have done so. These results are highly inconsistent with the claims of e-democracy advocates. Two important factors account for the lack of e-democracy at the American grassroots: lack of funding and lack of perceived demand. A
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 16:21:42 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:51:39 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:29:56 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:58:16 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 04:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
玉林市| 金川县| 大余县| 高要市| 潮州市| 溆浦县| 辛集市| 博湖县| 彝良县| 嵊泗县| 合山市| 墨脱县| 东港市| 建始县| 泾川县| 克东县| 井冈山市| 全州县| 阿拉尔市| 平乡县| 鸡西市| 房山区| 景谷| 苏尼特右旗| 连云港市| 南京市| 大城县| 民县| 厦门市| 锦州市| 祁连县| 玉树县| 民权县| 封丘县| 深水埗区| 黄冈市| 奉新县| 那坡县| 阳春市| 巴南区| 芦溪县|