找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Electronic Participation; Fourth IFIP WG 8.5 I Efthimios Tambouris,Ann Macintosh,?ystein S?b? Conference proceedings 2012 IFIP Internationa

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 涌出
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:57:52 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 22:03:31 | 只看該作者
,Sicherheit an Roboterarbeitspl?tzen,lternating Transition Systems. We now present a system that uses the same model to critique proposals from citizens. A prototype has been implemented in Prolog and we illustrate the ideas with code fragments and a running example.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:39:16 | 只看該作者
Brazil’s Green Energy: Today and Tomorrowrticipation process. This paper suggests the use of an ontological approach when specifying these eParticipation environments, in order to reduce the designer’s cognitive efforts when designing effective eParticipation environments.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:57:03 | 只看該作者
Industrielles Reduktionsmanagementhelp users make sense of the range of publicly expressed opinions about public policies. The major challenges we face in using argument visualization tools for online consultations can be clustered around the four main concepts of transparency, sense-making, readability and scalability, in this paper we show how we are addressing these challenges.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 08:33:35 | 只看該作者
PolicyCommons — Visualizing Arguments in Policy Consultationhelp users make sense of the range of publicly expressed opinions about public policies. The major challenges we face in using argument visualization tools for online consultations can be clustered around the four main concepts of transparency, sense-making, readability and scalability, in this paper we show how we are addressing these challenges.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:22:02 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:14:19 | 只看該作者
E-Consultations: A Review of Current Practice and a Proposal for Opening Up the Processonsultations that extend the knowledge base and the legitimacy of policy-making. However, current e-consultation practice in the EU falls short of the potential. The paper proposes a deliberative turn, the use of special purpose technologies and the integration of social media discourse into the con
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:40:44 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:16:16 | 只看該作者
A Communication Genre Perspective on e-Petitioning: The Case of the Citizens’ Initiativects to the Commission. The present paper offers a conceptual model for the analysis of this eParticipation case, and other similar e-petitioning practices, which is not biased by political ambition or technological determinism. The operational framework proposed aims to understand the nature of comm
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:59:25 | 只看該作者
Citizens’ Evaluation of an Online Argument Visualisation Platform for eParticipation promising for improving eParticipation e.g. by avoiding repetition and enhancing clarity in debates. In this paper we present and discuss citizens’ opinion on utilising an AV platform for eParticipation, specifically for discussing the emerging topic of environment and climate change. Results have
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 06:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
大城县| 舟曲县| 普安县| 互助| 石楼县| 巴彦县| 保靖县| 图木舒克市| 庄浪县| 若羌县| 浮山县| 皮山县| 电白县| 阿拉善盟| 皮山县| 静安区| 浦城县| 通江县| 樟树市| 博兴县| 舒兰市| 昌都县| 衢州市| 青铜峡市| 武义县| 廉江市| 旅游| 建始县| 凉山| 阿图什市| 安陆市| 北京市| 泉州市| 红河县| 苗栗市| 扬州市| 天等县| 休宁县| 龙里县| 景东| 尚志市|