找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes; William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 20

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51117|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:24:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes
編輯William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/306/305636/305636.mp4
概述Presents a comprehensive overview of the theory of voting paradoxes.Studies voting procedures with regard to their likelihood of actually observing paradoxical election outcome.Validates the theoretic
叢書名稱Studies in Choice and Welfare
圖書封面Titlebook: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes;  William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 20
描述This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be developed, but this analysis examines factors that are related to the process by which voters form their preferences on candidates that will significantly reduce the likelihood that such voting paradoxes will ever actually be observed. It is found that extreme forms of voting paradoxes should be uncommon events with a small number of candidates. Another consideration is the propensity of common voting rules to elect the Condorcet Winner, which is widely accepted as the best choice as the winner, when it exists. All common voting rules are found to have identifiable scenarios for which they perform well on the basis of this criterion. But, Borda Rule is found to consistently work well at electing the Condorcet Winner, while the other voting rules have scenarios where they work poorly or have a very small likelihood of electing a different candidate than Borda Rule. The conclusions of previous theoretical work are presented in an expository format an
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Voting; Voting rules; Elections; Election procedures; Social choice; Condorcet‘s Paradox; Voting paradox; V
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64659-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87845-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-64659-6Series ISSN 1614-0311 Series E-ISSN 2197-8530
issn_series 1614-0311
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes被引頻次




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes年度引用




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes讀者反饋




書目名稱Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:15:42 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:39:02 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:57:18 | 只看該作者
Two-Stage Election Procedures,orcet Efficiency. Theoretical analysis shows that the Condorcet Efficiency of these two-stage voting rules consistently marginally dominate Borda Rule as the various measures of group mutual coherence change. However, it is also found that the probability that either of the two-stage rules will elec
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:56:42 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:23:14 | 只看該作者
Other Voting Rules and Considerations,voting, since it is a frequently held belief that Borda Rule is particularly susceptible to manipulation. A careful investigation shows that the validity of this perception does not hold up under scrutiny. A voting rule that has recently received a lot of attention is also analyzed; the Three-valued
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:38:18 | 只看該作者
Green Infrastructure to Pursue Two Visionsof dependence among voters’ preferences will reduce the probability of observing paradoxes and changing the degree of homogeneity among voters’ preferences will also predictably alter their likelihoods.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:31:41 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:34:34 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:51:44 | 只看該作者
,Measures of Agreement in Voters’ Preferences,consistent relationship is found to exist for those models that are based on group mutual coherence that assume that voters can mutually agree on an underlying ordering of candidates along a common dimension.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-26 21:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
广西| 武冈市| 枣庄市| 垫江县| 镇巴县| 青阳县| 和平县| 岑巩县| 志丹县| 蛟河市| 内黄县| 北票市| 宁河县| 永宁县| 五华县| 汪清县| 靖远县| 武清区| 灵山县| 杭州市| 毕节市| 克拉玛依市| 浑源县| 申扎县| 东安县| 临潭县| 南漳县| 吴忠市| 木里| 怀远县| 什邡市| 乡城县| 大田县| 西宁市| 马公市| 兴海县| 筠连县| 岳池县| 桦甸市| 黔江区| 沙洋县|