Titlebook: Edmund Spenser‘s War on Lord Burghley; Bruce Danner Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2011 fiction.

callous

Class Formation of Fisher in Balikpapan,ord, Lady Scroop, Lady Strange, Lady Sheffield, Lady Chandos, Lady Warwick (widow of Ambrose Dudley, Earl of Warwick), and Elizabeth of Hardwick, Countess of Shrewsbury.. Greeting the queen and her party were Burghley’s two sons Robert and Thomas, and almost certainly their wives, Elizabeth Brooke a

改良

Introductionave never been adequately explained or received the close attention that they deserve. Spenser criticized and insulted Burghley in a series of allusions published in 1591 and 1596, and yet the poet accused the great minister himself of starting the conflict through an unmerited disapproval of his wo

commune

圖畫文字

Dedicatory Sonnets and the Poetics of Misreading so strong and unflattering that it is difficult to attribute the poet’s motives to irony or indirection. Part I of this study reconsiders what Burghley actually misread and why. Thus far, it has argued that Spenser frames the Lord Treasurer as an interpreter in bad faith of the Book 3 conclusion to

nascent

薄荷醇

嫌惡

PUT

The Legacy of the , and the Question of Slander conflict with the Lord Treasurer, the poet’s remarks by no means settle the issue on either factual or motivational grounds. If the poet boldly proclaims and rejects the criticism of the great statesman, his response is less pointed than his attacks in 1591, more cryptic and deflective. It could ha

Synovial-Fluid

Afterwordetrospective portrait of the Earl of Leicester. To accord the poem so much attention is to read it against its current literary-critical reputation. As its commentators never seem to tire of informing us, the . is not even a good poem — let alone a great one. And as a work rooted firmly in its own h

盤旋

10樓