Titlebook: Edgar Rubin and Psychology in Denmark; Figure and Ground J?rgen L. Pind Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 David

impale

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44072-9ally experienced figures] where the figure–ground distinction was first elucidated. Major findings of the thesis and Rubin’s phenomenological approach are discussed in detail in the chapter. The chapter also describes the difficulties the University of Copenhagen had in finding a successor to Harald H?ffding upon his retirement.

effrontery

顯示

FORGO

BLINK

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21247-5aced by Rubin’s introspective methodology. In the 1920s, Rubin would see his research on figure and ground allied with that of the Gestalt psychologists. Rubin reacted in some ways adversely to this. The chapter discusses Rubin’s relation to Gestalt psychology in some detail.

deactivate

1572-1914 ts Rubin’s approach who was highly critical of psychological “schools.” His criticisms of the overambitious theoretical aspirations of Gestalt psychology, his negative attitude towards school formation?in psych978-3-319-03314-3978-3-319-01062-5Series ISSN 1572-1914 Series E-ISSN 1574-9029

遺傳學(xué)

ascend