找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics; A Review with Regard Felix Ekardt Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 41163|回復(fù): 38
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:07:34 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics
副標(biāo)題A Review with Regard
編輯Felix Ekardt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/302/301586/301586.mp4
概述New (critical) approach to cost-benefit analysis.Very interdisciplinary approach to decision theory.Rearranging the role of economics in the sustainability and climate discourse
叢書名稱Environmental Humanities: Transformation, Governance, Ethics, Law
圖書封面Titlebook: Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics; A Review with Regard Felix Ekardt Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and
描述With cost-benefit analysis, economic sciences cultivate a specific decision-making procedure, which has also been partially adopted in politics. Although economists do not experience the approach as normative, on closer examination the approach can be identified as an economic ethics. The present philosophical and at the same time transdisciplinary (with special legal and economic components) treatment examines the persuasive power of this approach using climate change as an example, as the most important sustainability issue. The objections raised against the economisation of decision-making with regard to the utilitarian tradition, such as the criticism of the orientation towards weighing up options, the alleged lack of distributive justice or the tendency to describe people in behavioural science as selfish, are hardly or not at all convincing on closer examination. In several respects, however, it turns out that cost-benefit analysis faces insoluble problems. Firstly, the theoretical basis of (hidden normative) cost-benefit analysis in philosophical empiricism does not seem tenable. This means the idea of empiricism that normative questions must be transformed into questions of
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Climate economics; Decision theory; Sustainability ethics; Environmental law; Economic policy instrument
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99284-2
isbn_softcover978-3-030-99286-6
isbn_ebook978-3-030-99284-2Series ISSN 2524-5708 Series E-ISSN 2524-5716
issn_series 2524-5708
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics被引頻次




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics年度引用




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:51:25 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:42:32 | 只看該作者
Idea-Historical Foundations and Dubious (Standard) Objections to Cost-Benefit Analysis,ds balancing, of an allegedly lack of distributive justice, or of the tendency to describe human beings as egoist in terms of behavioral science, are hardly convincing upon closer examination. In short, for various reasons, balancing is unavoidable in decision-making; absolutely balancing-free norma
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:22:01 | 只看該作者
Frictions on the Application Level: Costs and Benefits, Discounting, Uncertainty, Fact Base,very differently distributed abilities to pay. Empirically, the belief in infinite economic growth underlying cost-benefit analysis appears rather less robust. Thus, there are unsolvable application problems for the cost-benefit analysis. Those problems especially (but not exclusively) become visibl
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:28:25 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:15:12 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:47:44 | 只看該作者
Mathias M?urer,Rüdiger Holzapfelhis method, which is also increasingly used in politics (especially in environmental policy), takes people’s factual preferences as they are. Based on this, it tries to identify social conditions with the greatest possible benefit which are translated into monetary units and the lowest possible cost
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:26:06 | 只看該作者
,Erkrankungen der neuromuskul?ren Endplatte,ds balancing, of an allegedly lack of distributive justice, or of the tendency to describe human beings as egoist in terms of behavioral science, are hardly convincing upon closer examination. In short, for various reasons, balancing is unavoidable in decision-making; absolutely balancing-free norma
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:19:30 | 只看該作者
Vincent K. Tuohy,R. Philip Kinkelvery differently distributed abilities to pay. Empirically, the belief in infinite economic growth underlying cost-benefit analysis appears rather less robust. Thus, there are unsolvable application problems for the cost-benefit analysis. Those problems especially (but not exclusively) become visibl
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:47:01 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93613-5 damaged ecosystems. Furthermore, for good reasons, decision-making in liberal democracies is representative-democratic with only isolated plebiscitary (and participatory) additions. This is contrary to the plebiscitary intentions of the cost-benefit analysis. Also, for good reasons, confirmed by ce
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 13:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
大洼县| 梅河口市| 邯郸县| 开江县| 象州县| 沙河市| 海城市| 天柱县| 新丰县| 龙江县| 桑植县| 临沧市| 手机| 阿拉善右旗| 上饶市| 绥江县| 台中市| 闵行区| 东源县| 汕头市| 保靖县| 金阳县| 桂林市| 鹤岗市| 天镇县| 大厂| 万年县| 吐鲁番市| 孟村| 德化县| 墨脱县| 定陶县| 车致| 凤冈县| 睢宁县| 丰顺县| 永仁县| 连南| 克东县| 崇阳县| 武冈市|