Titlebook: Ecology of Marine Deposit Feeders; Glenn Lopez,Gary Taghon,Jeffrey Levinton Conference proceedings 1989 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 198

FAWN

,Régressions et interpolations,First, it is easy to avoid thinking about sediment movement because it does not occur when one walks out on a sand- or mudflat, and one often avoids it in diving situations as well. Second, very little is known about the mechanics of particle deposition in water, so one cannot extrapolate readily to

同義聯(lián)想法

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6476-7 relatable to the scale of the organisms under study (see Cammen, this volume). This recommendation was made by Ralph Johnson in 1974, but it has scarcely been heeded. He urged benthic ecologists to devise measures of the food resource and its partitioning that were relevant to the requirements and

里程碑

鉤針織物

Establishing a Warrant for Research,nput terms. Models of the feeding and behavior of deposit feeders are a recent addition to benthic ecology (e.g., Calow, 1975; Jumars et al., 1982; Levinton and Lopez, 1977; Taghon et al., 1978; Taghon, 1981). This chapter discusses models that fall under the general heading of optimal foraging theory.

雀斑

CAPE

Scleroderma

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446961l, sedimentological, physical and ecological investigations. In the past decade there have been dramatic gains in organic carbon geochemistry contrasting to slower progress in ecology of deep-sea deposit feeding. Therefore, rather than reviewing the old question of, “what is the role of detritus fee

inhibit

Lars Bo Kaspersen,Norman Gabriellated to the size and composition of the deposit-feeding community. Fresh allochthonous POM from the water column and autochthonous POM from epibenthic primary production are incorporated into the deposit by burial and through geophysical and biological mixing. Although the quality and quantity of o

裝勇敢地做

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363619e the bulk of the food for many species. The ability to use such food is indicated by feeding experiments which have shown ingestion selectivity by deposit feeders for protein-coated beads (Taghon 1982; Taghon and Jumars 1984) and demonstrated an ability to absorb non-living organic matter (Lopez et

filicide

Wise Reasoning in an Uncertain World,ations in feeding rate both among species (Cammen, 1980) and within individuals (Taghon and Jumars, 1984), respectively demanding digestive diversity and flexibility. Intuitively, it seems likely that organisms eating sand and mud might more often be limited by processing ability and food quality —