Titlebook: Ecology and Literature; Ecocentric Personifi Bryan L. Moore Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2008 America.Am

intensify

書目名稱Ecology and Literature影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ecology and Literature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecology and Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Ecology and Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecology and Literature被引頻次




書目名稱Ecology and Literature被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecology and Literature年度引用




書目名稱Ecology and Literature年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecology and Literature讀者反饋




書目名稱Ecology and Literature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

高爾夫

羊欄

recession

娘娘腔

Conclusion,d but important point in the intersection of the ancient art of rhetoric and the still-new field of ecocriticism. My account is complete enough to have thrown some light on an overlooked argument-by-trope in the history of ideas and in American literature especially. It is a trope that began, in ess

conservative

conservative

Anthropomorphic Subversion in American Literature,ever, Nature-in-itself” (71), she recognizes that the (anthropomorphic) “symbolic context” given to nature is the only option for those who wish to write about the natural world. Quoting Yeats’s “Sailing to Byzantium,” she notes that “even the golden bird is a ‘bodily form [taken from a] natural thing.’ No, it’s impossible to escape!” (73–74).

Provenance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84291-6licitly for an eco-centric view of the world (among others, Thoreau, Leopold, Muir, Eiseley, Abbey, and Williams) but also in a great number of literary works from antiquity to the present, many of which are not typically considered ecocentric or often discussed by ecocritics.

共同給與

Conclusion,licitly for an eco-centric view of the world (among others, Thoreau, Leopold, Muir, Eiseley, Abbey, and Williams) but also in a great number of literary works from antiquity to the present, many of which are not typically considered ecocentric or often discussed by ecocritics.

縱欲

Atreyee Mondal,Nilanjan Dey,Amira S. Ashour views on nature and the means of language to apprehend it as first devised by Wordsworth, Coleridge, Emerson, Thoreau, and, of course, Charles Darwin. I am in this section predominantly concerned with the ecocentric personifications of a group of nature writers, but I do not suggest that all of their personifications are of this type.