Titlebook: Ecological Rationality in Spatial Planning; Concepts and Tools f Carlo Rega Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Spatial Planning.

Frequency-Range

Conclusions and Ways Forward: Five Propositions for Bringing Back Ecological Rationality in Spatialplanning under the paradigm of ecological rationality are proposed. It is argued that the latter should build on: (1) a stronger expertise on ecology and system theory by planners; (2) a stronger capacity to identify and interpret the broader drivers of changes underlying the local processes of land

溝通

2520-8306 tounderpin ecological planning, such as Green Infrastructure and the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Service (MAES) initiative, are also examined..978-3-030-33029-3978-3-030-33027-9Series ISSN 2520-8306 Series E-ISSN 2520-8314

florid

Distributed Client/Server and Data,Ecology as a sub-discipline), System Theory and the sets of social sciences dealing with mechanisms of social choices, institutions and political sciences. This knowledge base serves to inform planning both through enabling a better identification and understanding of the driving forces and to deriv

debris

Linearization of Nonlinear Systems,mon Agricultural Policies. For each of them, the link (implicit, explicit, or in need to be fully developed and exploited) with spatial planning is addressed and discussed. The role of the “environmental safeguard directives” and in particular Strategic Environmental Assessment as a cross-cutting po

GUISE

bile648

Policies and Regulatory Frames in the EU and the Needed Link with Spatial Planning,mon Agricultural Policies. For each of them, the link (implicit, explicit, or in need to be fully developed and exploited) with spatial planning is addressed and discussed. The role of the “environmental safeguard directives” and in particular Strategic Environmental Assessment as a cross-cutting po

Palter

白楊魚(yú)

The Macdonald bibliographical guideshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/306472.jpg