Titlebook: Ecological Literature and the Critique of Anthropocentrism; Bryan L. Moore Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

有法律效應(yīng)

The Earth as Pinprick: Some Early Western Challenges to Anthropocentrism,oped over roughly 800?years. The ancients show that the questioning of anthropocentrism is nothing new; their work is part of the bridge required to help us move more responsibly into the later parts of the twenty-first century and beyond.

承認(rèn)

Lowering the Human Throne: European Literature to 1900,here (e.g., . and .). Other figures I discuss include Joachim du Bellay, Edmund Spenser, John Dyer, Mary Shelley (.), Madame de Stael (.), Chateaubriand (.), Goethe, Wordsworth, Clare, and Tennyson. I conclude the chapter with a brief overview of responses to anthropocentrism by some French Symbolists.

invert

平躺

形容詞

保留

愉快嗎

吞噬

Courses of Empire: Ecological Apocalypse in Early American Literature,entalists such as Emerson and Thoreau, echoing Wordsworth and other European romantics, elevate humans as divine, but their views are far from anthropocentric. Writers such as Hawthorne and Melville operate more skeptically and metaphysically in problematizing anthropocentrism.

Sinus-Rhythm

新字

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4715-5cal, and religious contexts for the literary texts discussed in subsequent chapters. I provide definitions of anthropocentrism and its alternatives (“soft” anthropocentrism, ecocentrism); show my work’s relationship with the Anthropocene; comment on some of the implications of my research for the gr