Titlebook: Ecodocumentaries; Critical Essays Rayson K. Alex,S. Susan Deborah Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Ecocritici

patch-test

書目名稱Ecodocumentaries影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries被引頻次




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries年度引用




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries讀者反饋




書目名稱Ecodocumentaries讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

墊子

,’,: Cinematic Affect, Animation, and the Perceptual Dilemmas of Slow Violenceo cinema, it considers how a postcolonial Indian filmmaker uses animation to mediate socio-environmental injustices that are not spectacular but instead accumulate over long periods of time. In illuminating .’.’s dark and discordant mode of animation, I also suggest that such postcolonial cinema exp

大吃大喝

鋪?zhàn)?/a>

Ophthalmologist

Ecological Imperialism in the Age of the Posthuman: David Fedele’s ,osby’s term “ecological imperialism.” The e-waste of the First World, sent on a regular basis to the Third World for recycling, causes an ongoing devastation in the more-than-human world. As Karen Barad observes, “questions of ethics and of justice are always already threaded through the very fabric

cogent

cogent

, Modernity and Making Sense of the Crisis in Natureto clean air and water. Progress is also a word upon which ideas of nationhood and identity have been built and buttressed, wars fought and forests plundered, rivers dammed, people dispossessed and displaced, and animals and plants driven to extinction. The irony of Harold Crooks and Mathieu Roy’s d

DOTE

What is “A” Fig?which can be told apart from all its relations, including its pollinators and other beneficiaries. The present chapter challenges this basic ontological assumption by looking closely at a sycamore fig, the protagonist of the film . (and by extension, all organisms). In fact, the chapter approaches t

vocation

不舒服