Titlebook: Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy; Peter Distelzweig,Benjamin Goldberg,Evan R. Raglan Book 2016 Springer Science+Business Media

評估

書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy讀者反饋學科排名

nettle

間接

Camouflage

Why All This Jelly? Jacopo Zabarella and Hieronymus Fabricius ab Aquapendente on the Usefulness of t theories of light, color, and vision in subtle but significant ways. In this paper I show how anatomy and philosophy conspired to understand the structure and the purpose of the parts of the eye in two important, but largely overlooked, works by professors at the University of Padua: the natural ph

大量殺死

Machines of the Body in the Seventeenth Centurydevices were promptly deployed in anatomical investigations. I also discuss the role of dead bodies as boundary objects between living bodies and machines, highlighting their problematic status in experimentation and vivisection.

Pandemic

Pandemic

Descartes on the Theory of Life and Methodology in the Life Scienceseoretical conception of living bodies must be. I then show that this conception might well run afoul of his rejection of final causal explanations in natural philosophy. Nonetheless, I show how Descartes might have made use of such explanations as merely hypothetical, even though he explicitly block

tendinitis

Mechanism, the Senses, and Reason: Franciscus Sylvius and Leiden Debates Over Anatomical Knowledge An of the heart. In the wake of Harvey’s anatomical demonstration of the circulation of the blood, and Descartes’s provocative but error-prone anatomical speculations, Dutch physicians adopted varied positions on the sources and status of anatomical knowledge. This article attends to Leiden professor

大門在匯總

Louis de la Forge and the Development of Cartesian Medical Philosophyhis development of occasionalism within the Cartesian school. Commentators such as Balz (1932), Garber (1987), and Nadler (1998) have focused on the consequences of La Forge’s views for Cartesian metaphysics and physics, with little consideration of La Forge’s medical philosophy. We argue that La Fo

folliculitis

Transplantation and Corpuscular Identity in Paracelsian Vital Philosophyconstruction of “chymical” matter theory in the seventeenth-century scientific revolution, owing to a thematic incommensurability between the new mechanistic theories and the vital philosophy of the Paracelsians. As a result, vital philosophy is more often characterized in terms of “correspondences”