Titlebook: Early Modern Intertextuality; Sarah Carter Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021 Plurality of discourse.Cultural

Tartar

Parody and Intertextuality: The Ovidian Epyllia,cial to understanding the production and consumption of these texts, and how the genre itself works as a system of meaning which is endlessly self-referential and parodic, as well as heavily invested in rejecting previous Petrarchan literary conventions.

prediabetes

Text, Intertext, Hypertext?,also outlines the possibility of aligning intertextual theory with that of hypertexts and proposes the construction of a hypertext model using early modern texts to act as an electronic model of intertextuality.

青少年

cochlea

不溶解

背心

A-M. Mingers,N. Heimburger,E. Lutzon of classical texts by classical writers via its narrative set in the court of the Emperor Augustus. It also instigated an intertextual response, Marston and Dekker’s .. As well as investigating the propriety of satire, the text also makes claims for the proper production and use of poetry, all via an intertextual reading.

深陷

2634-5919 tification of classical references yet are historically specThis book is an exploration of the viability of applying the post structuralist theory of intertextuality to early modern texts. It suggests that a return to a more theorised understanding of intertextuality, as that outlined by Julia Krist

兵團(tuán)

Early Modern Intertextuality: Post-structuralism, Narrative Systems, and ,modern period due to the focus and prioritisation of the creative imitation of classical and contemporary texts. How meaning is created and conveyed through intertextual reference is foregrounded. The introduction suggests that intertextuality has become somewhat reduced in theoretical terms to be u

Throttle

Virtues