找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Early Gastrointestinal Cancers II: Rectal Cancer; Florian Otto,Manfred P. Lutz Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 201

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Definite
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:19:25 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33071-5 was probably more efficient (in terms of ypCR) than short course (25/5), and (4) capecitabine was as efficient as 5 FU but oxaliplatin was not adding benefit. Overall, the gains of nCRT remain modest and it is mainly a reduction in local relapse not exceeding 5?%, but no benefit in survival and nei
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:55:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-32623-7e response (pCR) rate was about 10?% higher in the delayed-surgery group. There were no differences in sphincter preservation and R0 resection rate between the two groups. Small studies suggest no differences in the oncological outcomes. Regarding elderly patients who were unfit for chemotherapy, sh
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:23:26 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33291-7h treatment regimens. While there is hardly an increase in early toxicity after preoperative SCRT with immediate surgery, late toxicity is substantial compared to surgery alone. Early toxicity is more frequent when a longer interval between SCRT and surgery is used and is comparable to the toxicity
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 06:30:01 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:58:37 | 只看該作者
Total Mesorectal Excision: Open, Laparoscopic or Roboticerative outcomes and similar oncologic results. However, the conversion rate of LTME is around 17?%. The literature supporting RTME is more limited. Robotic rectal resection appears to have similar postoperative and oncologic outcomes compared to LTME. RTME results in higher costs and possibly lower
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:29:47 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:22:09 | 只看該作者
Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Canceroadjuvant therapy (50?%). The most frequently used instruments were the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), its colorectal cancer specific module QLQ-CR38, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 items questionnaire. Findin
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:08:27 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:26:34 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:36:56 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 15:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
陈巴尔虎旗| 定兴县| 朝阳市| 平定县| 茶陵县| 汾西县| 伊川县| 惠州市| 玉屏| 新乡市| 旬邑县| 乌恰县| 宁晋县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 新丰县| 彭州市| 勐海县| 秭归县| 江山市| 黄梅县| 隆安县| 绍兴县| 彰化市| 天全县| 邯郸县| 隆安县| 云龙县| 昌黎县| 双牌县| 海原县| 廊坊市| 团风县| 永丰县| 方正县| 资兴市| 泸西县| 桑日县| 濮阳县| 赣州市| 建瓯市| 清流县|