Titlebook: Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition; Sorin Costreie Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

隼鷹

1566-659X ntinuities rather than discrepancies?.Includes supplementaryThis volume discusses some crucial ideas of the founders of the analytic philosophy: Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein, or the ‘golden trio’. The book shows how these ‘old’ ideas are still present and influential in th

匯總

膠狀

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47697-0e do is that although Frege remains true to the spirit of the model, he also modifies it in very fundamental ways. So modified, I will suggest, the model continues to provide a viable and compelling image of scientific rationality by showing, in broad outline, how we achieve, and maintain, cognitive control in our mathematical investigations.

NEX

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00149-4s a theorem in 1906. Although it is not proved in 1910, the two lemmas from the proof in 1906 occur as theorems, and Peirce’s Law could have been derived from them in a two step proof. The history of Peirce’s Law in Russell’s systems helps to reconstruct some of the history of axiomatic systems of classical propositional logic.

飛鏢

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14794-4he case: our ordinary notions play, in a sense, an even more important role in Carnap’s philosophy of mathematics than they do in Frege’s. Finally, I address Tyler Burge’s interpretation of Frege which is in opposition to any Carnapian reading of Frege.

AIL

成份

Frege and the Aristotelian Model of Sciencee do is that although Frege remains true to the spirit of the model, he also modifies it in very fundamental ways. So modified, I will suggest, the model continues to provide a viable and compelling image of scientific rationality by showing, in broad outline, how we achieve, and maintain, cognitive control in our mathematical investigations.

大笑

過份好問

DOSE

Wittgenstein’s Color Exclusion and Johnson’s Determinableclusive moment (Sect. .), drawing on a early work of Prior, I argue that the distinction made by Wittgenstein and Johnson between predication and determination should be looked at from a long term historical perspective.