找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: EU Criminal Justice; Fundamental Rights, Tommaso Rafaraci,Rosanna Belfiore Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 EU criminal law a

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: fumble
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:54:13 | 只看該作者
Defence Areas and Limits in the Investigations of the European Public Prosecutorhe provisions from which a guarantee statute can be extracted for those who will be subject to investigation and actions by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Author concludes with an altogether positive assessment about the defence statute before the European Public Prosecutor’s Office bu
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:45:55 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:07:33 | 只看該作者
Fair Trial Rights in the European Union: Reconciling Accused and Victims’ Rightsready guaranteed by the ECtHR? How do these rights compete or balance with the rights given the victims? This paper brings all these developments together and sketches the steps towards building up the rights-component of European criminal law.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:42:28 | 只看該作者
The Right of Access to a Lawyer in the European Union: Directive 2013/48/EU and Its Implementation iinimum standards on the rights, support and protection of the victims of crime, the EU adopted different measures on the minimum procedural rights of defendants. In this paper, the Author focusses her attention on Directive 2013/48/EU, 22 October 2013, on the right of access to a lawyer and its implementation into the Spanish legal system.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:32:55 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:03:31 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:39:36 | 只看該作者
on the other, no effective remedies have been introduced in criminal proceedings. The result is the Italian judiciary seems not to have recognised the reform’s importance by continuing the restrictive interpretation of the right to linguistic assistance.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:45:58 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:58:49 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:04:11 | 只看該作者
Die Transportschicht des Internets,urt. This paper, however, argues that judicial control of a Union institution should be exercised by a Union court and that the treaty system of judicial protection does not allow for a delegation of jurisdiction to national courts.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 09:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
泰和县| 东兰县| 大埔区| 望谟县| 潞城市| 巨野县| 陆河县| 洮南市| 云南省| 唐海县| 新邵县| 从江县| 莫力| 遵化市| 花莲县| 鄂尔多斯市| 玉山县| 潮州市| 翁牛特旗| 邛崃市| 康乐县| 岚皋县| 镇远县| 潮州市| 抚顺市| 峨山| 宣汉县| 马山县| 齐齐哈尔市| 灵丘县| 潼关县| 永寿县| 宝应县| 德令哈市| 平顶山市| 克什克腾旗| 安国市| 那坡县| 临洮县| 涡阳县| 射洪县|