Titlebook: EU Civil Society; Patterns of Cooperat H?kan Johansson,Sara Kalm Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Civil socie

Intercept

corporate

壟斷

積習(xí)已深

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25146-1er-Koch and Rittberger, 2007b; Ruzza, 2006 and 2007; Smismans, 2003). With the ambition to foster a European civil society, the EU has incentivised the formation of EU-level civil society actors by providing funding as well as opportunities for access and consultation to EU institutions. Most conspi

MEAN

General practitioners and the hospitals,tion in the literature. They encompass not only public pressure groups but also organisations that in addition to advocacy engage in protest activities, such as social movement groups. Also included are organisations that engage in judicial activism and various groups specialised in forms of service

詞匯

Presidentializing the Premiershipisation of different kinds (Favell and Guiraudon, 2011; Georgakakis and Lasalle, 2010; Kauppi, 2005; Lee Mudge and Vauchez, 2012). Key concepts such as capital, field and symbolic dominance proved to be adequate tools for coming to terms with complex processes of national disembedding and transnatio

向外供接觸

ety organisations (CSOs). These actors engage in a range of issues and causes and seek to represent various groups, such as ‘poor people’, ‘homeless’, ‘women’ and ‘people with functional impairments’. Gradually, they have formed coalitional relationships with each other, the Platform of European Soc

SOB

ocial change issues at the European Union (EU) level, known as the Platform of European Social NGOs (‘the Platform’). The Platform is a Commission-sponsored and Brussels-based coalition of diverse European CSO networks and federations of voluntary and social welfare organisations formally launched i

無情

Dna262