Titlebook: EU Bilateral Trade Agreements and Intellectual Property: For Better or Worse?; Josef Drexl,Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan,Souheir Nad Book 201

直覺沒有

IP Enforcement Provisions in EU Economic Partnership Agreementser is the Association Agreement between the EU and the Central American States. This agreement contains fewer TRIPS-plus enforcement provisions and its enforcement level is somewhat closer to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) than to the EU’s domestic legislation and ACTA.

吞吞吐吐

IPRs), focusing on their geographic scope. It poses the question: Which are the main countries seeking more extensive protection from their developing countries counterparts and which are the countries that agree to new commitments that go beyond those multilaterally agreed upon in the context of th

受人支配

,Woolf’s Moments; Lawrence’s Daemon,spective of the . for strengthened intellectual property (IP) protection in the TRIPS negotiations and the subsequent gains made in bilateral and plurilateral free trade agreements (FTAs). The comment concludes that the IP chapters of FTAs throw light on what the two major . for stronger IP protecti

Initiative

去世

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2723-5 what is required under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). This paper examines, first, the extent to which those TRIPS-plus requirements may influence the law of the World Trade Organization (WTO), particularly through interpretations under the

hypnogram

deforestation

Outspoken

Conclusion Postmodernism and Performance, agreements (EPAs) may serve as models for the progressive development of international intellectual property law. Other chapters in this volume strongly suggest that the intellectual property (IP) provisions represent a concession or cost for developing country parties in favor of the EU, including

TRACE

perimenopause

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90062-9l be shown, no clear pattern emerges from the analysis as regards a distinction between agreements with a purely mercantilist stance and those that also incorporate other, non-mercantilist aims. In particular, the EPAs incorporate more or less close copies of the domestic European Union (EU) legisla