Titlebook: EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009; Henk W. de Regt,Stephan Hartmann,Samir Okasha Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Netherlands

murmur

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6578-0re oriented primarily toward this practical goal, and its exemplary successes are practical accomplishments, such as creation of cell lines with desirable properties or regeneration of animal tissues in vivo. The question therefore arises: to what . standard are stem cell experiments responsible? At

FLEET

顛簸下上

t: Persisting objects . if they are multiply located in (space-)time, and persisting objects . if they are singly located by having numerically different temporal parts. In the framework of the special theory of relativity (SR), the metaphysics of persistence is confronted with peculiar difficulties

使苦惱

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9216-1lemma (PD). Augmenting a PD with signalling strategies promotes cooperation, but a challenge that must be addressed is what prevents signals being subverted by deceptive behaviour. Empirical results suggest that emotional displays can play a signalling role and, to some extent, are secure from subve

螢火蟲(chóng)

諂媚于人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5829-8ty, the establishment of clear definitions and guidelines for what causal inferences can safely be drawn from these experiments is of crucial importance. One of the aims of the philosophical treatment of causality and causal explanation is exactly this: to provide clear-cut boundaries for legitimate

憲法沒(méi)有

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3958-2views of the results of primary studies concerning a test hypothesis, set new standards of excellence on what counts as strong evidence. In the current prevailing mood in medical and behavioural sciences, it is only a properly conducted, up-to-date meta-analysis that licenses detachment of hypothese

Jubilation

召集

做作