Titlebook: E.M. Forster and The Politics of Imperialism; Mohammad Shaheen Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 20

儲備

周興旺

B-cell

Conclusion, movement ignored by Forster in . which, as we know, is focal in Said’s critique of Forster. What is particularly interesting is that Allen holds the same comparison Said makes between Edward Thompson and Forster to reach the same conclusion. This is what Allen says:

巡回

相互影響

人造

Person and Persona in the Portrait of Imperialism,er, not a party member or even a supporter of one, as he resolutely rejected any intimacy with the party system. He never wrote with a certain ideology in mind. What I find central in his outlook on politics is the amalgamation of the public and personal where the two emerge as one. He is never emba

外星人

,‘Hassan in England’: a Western Room with an Oriental View,‘fragment’ (whether Forster intended it to be so is another question). Hassan is obviously Masood. After the editor gives the fragment an approximate date (1907?), she comments: ‘It offers surprisingly early evidence of Forster’s interest in Indian and English differences, but his friendship with Ma

Mortar

Kernel

watertight,

Conclusion,what Richard Allen says in a contribution to a publication which he edited for the Open University . (already quoted above). Allen repeats almost everything Said said in . seven years before his contribution. He points to a nineteenth-century realist novel style in which Forster wrote his novel. The