找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Dignity, Freedom and Justice; Reiko Gotoh Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024 Rawls.Eudaimonia.Politica

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 8834|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:00:59 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice
編輯Reiko Gotoh
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/285/284773/284773.mp4
概述This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access.Critiques how dignity is treated in the social sciences.Redefines dignity in social sciences.Examines dignity from the per
圖書封面Titlebook: Dignity, Freedom and Justice;  Reiko Gotoh Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024 Rawls.Eudaimonia.Politica
描述.This is an open access book..Modern society is characterized by the fact of contingency, uncertainty, and ambiguity. The purpose of this book is to transform this phenomenal fact into a hopeful norm. As a clue, the book examines the concept of dignity and looks forward to a new definition.?.So far, the concept of dignity has been peripheral to the concerns of liberal social sciences. This book uses the concept of dignity as a source of light to illuminate the fundamental critique of liberal social sciences and philosophy. Can the theory of justice or discourse ethics truly realize the well-defined society it envisions in a fundamentally contingent, uncertain, and ambiguous situation? Can societies be inclusive of minorities relegated to the periphery with their dignity undermined? Can we resist the temptation to construct huge hierarchical stairs, forcing individuals to place themselves on one of its steps, and thus lining up different and diverse entities in along sequence, and eventually bringing about totalitarianism?..This book has a three-level telescopic structure. At the very front, there is a scope of reexaming the political liberalism in the light of dignity. Behind it is
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024
關(guān)鍵詞Rawls; Eudaimonia; Political Liberalism; Theory of Justice; Dignity and Justice; Dignity in Social Scienc
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0519-1
isbn_softcover978-981-97-0521-4
isbn_ebook978-981-97-0519-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice被引頻次




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice年度引用




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice讀者反饋




書目名稱Dignity, Freedom and Justice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:38:24 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:26:28 | 只看該作者
,Grundlagen für die st?dtebauliche Planung,ection that this notion is the result of a naturalistic fallacy, and the objection that it is the expression of speciesist arrogance. The conceptual structure of being an individual of a particular species, and thus having dignity that belongs to individuals of that species, is compatible with vario
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:10:38 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96806-7potential. Universal dignity is a moral status but acquired dignity is not. To pursue acquired dignity is the moral demand of universal dignity and protects people’s universal dignity. Confucian discussions on human dignity provide a promising way to justify the equality of human moral status, also,
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:27:33 | 只看該作者
Sucrose and osmotic dehydration, tensions with the private sphere—are discussed. To resolve these challenges, luck egalitarianism should be implemented relationally, guided by the idea of dignity and embodied in reasonable standards within social institutions.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:25:50 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:34:27 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:39:34 | 只看該作者
Introduction to ,ces and philosophy, working from existing connections between these two areas.?Throughout this book, the reader will find that theories of liberal social science?and philosophy contain clues of ideas and methods that critically develop themselves.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:12:16 | 只看該作者
The Normative Role of the Concept of Dignity in the Public Sphereowever, not all practical laws are necessarily in accordance with justice. There are cases in which the actual laws are not “correct.” In some of these cases, there will be a conflict between legality and morality within the state over a particular positive law. The theoretical prototype of this con
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:25:02 | 只看該作者
Human Dignity in Discourse Ethicsection that this notion is the result of a naturalistic fallacy, and the objection that it is the expression of speciesist arrogance. The conceptual structure of being an individual of a particular species, and thus having dignity that belongs to individuals of that species, is compatible with vario
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-2-1 18:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
荥经县| 大化| 收藏| 黄陵县| 扎赉特旗| 横山县| 晋城| 安阳县| 儋州市| 焦作市| 梁平县| 漠河县| 高唐县| 宣化县| 和顺县| 丹寨县| 闽侯县| 镇巴县| 临湘市| 梨树县| 麦盖提县| 沙雅县| 福鼎市| 临高县| 滕州市| 双柏县| 民乐县| 普兰店市| 鄄城县| 蛟河市| 禹州市| 廉江市| 静海县| 宜昌市| 大化| 南开区| 曲沃县| 榆林市| 盘锦市| 琼结县| 南昌县|