找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Deliberating War; Patricia Roberts-Miller Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer N

[復制鏈接]
查看: 39814|回復: 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:00:44 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Deliberating War
編輯Patricia Roberts-Miller
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/285/284508/284508.mp4
概述Brings together scholarship from various fields in a way that is engaging and accessible to non-specialists.Broadens the potential audience by avoiding or delaying potentially polarizing examples (but
圖書封面Titlebook: Deliberating War;  Patricia Roberts-Miller Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer N
描述.This book argues that treating politics as war derails essential democratic processes, including deliberation and policy argumentation, in complicated ways. “Politics is war” is not always just a figure of speech, but often a sincere expression of how people see disagreement—they mean it literally—and they use it to evade the responsibilities of rhetoric. This book takes the metaphor seriously. Using a series of case studies ranging from the 432 BCE “Debate at Sparta” to Bill O’Reilly’s recent invention of a “War on Christmas,” .Deliberating War .illustrates pathologies of deliberation that arise when a community understands itself to be at political war. This book identifies recurrent rhetorical strategies that constrain or even effectively prohibit deliberation, such as deflecting, reframing, threat inflation, appealing to paired terms, claiming moral license, radicalizing a base. In short, what seems to be an effective solution to an immediate rhetorical problem—using hyperbole and demagoguery to persuade people to adopt a specific leader or policy—is a trap that prevents democratic practices of compromise, deliberation, fairness, reciprocity. Unhappily, threat inflation—even w
出版日期Book 2024
關鍵詞demagoguery; propaganda; democratic deliberation; rhetoric of war; politics as war; policy argumentation;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60672-4
isbn_softcover978-3-031-60674-8
isbn_ebook978-3-031-60672-4
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Deliberating War影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deliberating War影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Deliberating War網絡公開度




書目名稱Deliberating War網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Deliberating War被引頻次




書目名稱Deliberating War被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Deliberating War年度引用




書目名稱Deliberating War年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Deliberating War讀者反饋




書目名稱Deliberating War讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:35:59 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:50:05 | 只看該作者
Factionalizing War,That the conflict over the Falklands/Malvinas resulted in a shooting war is somewhat puzzling, since neither Argentina nor the UK either wanted or expected one until almost the last minute. This chapter pursues the question of what role rhetoric had to play in that unexpected outcome.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:30:16 | 只看該作者
Criticizing War,This chapter uses three examples of critics of US policies in Vietnam with very different (even incompatible) ideologies in order to argue that the single-axis binary or continuum of political identity is both false and damaging. It enables motivism, deflection of deliberation, and shifts issues to group identity rather than policy options.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:12:53 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:35:14 | 只看該作者
Delaying War,he example of appeasing Hitler. The argument is that it is obvious that other nations should have responded with maximum aggression, and therefore, it is equally obvious that we should do so now. This chapter argues that the case is not so obvious.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:33:38 | 只看該作者
Patricia Roberts-MillerBrings together scholarship from various fields in a way that is engaging and accessible to non-specialists.Broadens the potential audience by avoiding or delaying potentially polarizing examples (but
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:49:58 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:43:53 | 只看該作者
,Führung und Führungsverhalten, intended to take the equation literally, that we should understand it as a figure of speech (hyperbole) intended to emphasize the commitment of the speaker. Yet in each of those cases, the rhetor invoked the equation of politics and war in order to justify violating moral norms—about violence (Mao
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:49:29 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-15 19:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
太保市| 泰宁县| 鄂尔多斯市| 共和县| 英吉沙县| 太湖县| 绥棱县| 开远市| 刚察县| 和田市| 四会市| 鞍山市| 德惠市| 紫金县| 隆安县| 天全县| 巴楚县| 东阿县| 武城县| 广德县| 敖汉旗| 银川市| 达孜县| 衡山县| 凤台县| 靖远县| 雷波县| 正镶白旗| 靖江市| 昌宁县| 辽阳市| 台前县| 喜德县| 横山县| 普陀区| 来安县| 徐汇区| 木兰县| 肥城市| 丹江口市| 临桂县|