Titlebook: Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications; Third International Manuel A. Martins,Igor Sedlár Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature

作業(yè)

書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications被引頻次




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications年度引用




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications讀者反饋




書目名稱Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Mumble

Thinking About Causation: A Causal Language with Epistemic Operators,he notion of a causal model [., ., ., .] with a representation of the epistemic state of an agent. On the side of the object language, we add operators to express knowledge and the act of observing new information. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the logic, and discuss the relation

flimsy

同時發(fā)生

Dealing with Unreliable Agents in Dynamic Gossip,ntly make peer-to-peer calls so that ultimately everyone knows all secrets. In Dynamic Gossip, agents share phone numbers in addition to secrets, which allows the network to grow at run-time..Most gossip protocols assume that all agents are reliable, but this is not given for many practical applicat

古董

死亡

Parameterized Complexity of Dynamic Belief Updates,ns on an initial epistemic model. It can also be considered as a plan verification problem in epistemic planning. The problem is known to be PSPACE-hard. To better understand the source of complexity of the problem, previous research has investigated the complexity of 128 parameterized versions of t

死亡

以煙熏消毒

heckle

Parallel

Complexity of Commutative Infinitary Action Logic,ility problem is .-complete. Thus, we obtain a commutative version of .-completeness for non-commutative infinitary action logic by Buszkowski and Palka (2007). The proof of the upper bound is more or less the same as Palka’s argument. For the lower bound, we encode non-terminating behaviour of two-